I'm not putting it in the thread to derail it but just do the classic Google search of "Jim Cummings controversy" and scroll slightly.
Pretty much, yeah.
Apparently downloading this newest one fixes it but yeah:I've rebooted and still getting a prompt to install .NET for LariLauncher, but the BG3 executable runs just fine.
Larian... just like... stop being annoying every single step of the way. Please!
And it's super fun to play, the changes are about the same as the ones on the Ranger.LOL bloody hell what.
Literally the first thing we learn about the Paladin subclasses they've got - Devotion and Ancients - is that Larian have completely made up new abilities for them!
That's not the best possible start to proceedings I must admit!
Devotion Paladins get "Holy Rebuke" which you put on a target and creatures attacking it take 1d4 damage (hopefully before they swing? Unclear). (This is a little bit like Rebuke the Violent from Redemption Paladins)
Ancients Paladins get some sort of AOE heal called "Healing Radiance" which looks decent-ish.
But is this replacing or in addition to Sacred Weapon/Nature's Wrath respectively, or their Turn abilities? Oh and you can also become an Oathbreaker by making certain conversation choices. Let's pray there's a warning that dialogue options will do that or it'll be autosave before all serious conversations class lol. Oathbreakers get Control Undead, which doesn't function at all like it does in the tabletop, but instead summons an undead and also is a spell not an ability.
Oh Larian...
Agreed. Maybe it will be revealed that Minsc is actually a statue and real Minsc will come by voiced by Jim at some point.Aw, that's unfortunate. I have nothing against Mercer but Jim Cummings did a great job.
Should note the accusations against Cummings where from his ex wife during a custody battle, where they were both saying bad things about each other. And Investigators found the accusations to be unsubstituted. The wife did not press any charges or bring that stuff up anywhere but the custody trial.
Not sure why you're saying I didn't read your posts in good faith? I think you're the one who may have misunderstood my point. You're saying that Solasta is a game that is faithful to 5E mechanics and was made on a smaller budget. I'm not disagreeing with that (and I also never said that you thought it was a triple-A game); I'm saying that it achieved that by spending no time or money on story.My point was to show that you can make a game with faithful 5E mechanics for very little money, instead of being lazy Larian style and put a shallow 5E varnish on top of an existing non-D&D system with non-D&D mechanics. I have never made any claims that Solasta is a glorious, tripple-A game, merely that the game has working 5E mechanics with a fraction of Larians budget.
I have no problem if you or others don't agree with my personal views on BG3, but at least try to read my posts in good faith.