Planescape is Jeremy Crawford's favourite D&D setting. "It is D&D", he says, as he talks about how in the 2024 core rulebook updates Planescape will be more up front and center as "the setting of settings".
I know when I order from Amazon, I put my mailing address as Earth. Since it's all the same planet, getting more specific than that is meaningless.Set in the multiverse = set everywhere. That's so broad that setting becomes meaningless, since setting is more specific than that.
You are actually making my point. You don't put Earth. You don't put the universe. You don't put the multiverse. You put something more specific. The Forgotten Realms is called a setting, but even then it's overly broad for most individual campaigns which are set in more specific areas of the Realms.I know when I order from Amazon, I put my mailing address as Earth. Since it's all the same planet, getting more specific than that is meaningless.
A multiverse includes everything that can possibly be imagined. Therefore, the MCU multiverse and the Star Wars multiverse exist within the D&D multiverse, and visa versa.I don't agree. The D&D multiverse is still a particular setting. It isn't the MCU multiverse or the Star Wars multiverse. It is its own setting, albeit a very broad one.
Which is why it fails as a specific setting.A multiverse includes everything that can possibly be imagined. Therefore, the MCU multiverse and the Star Wars multiverse exist within the D&D multiverse, and visa versa.
I'm not sold on that. Must any given multiverse contain every imaginable universe? Isn't it still a multiverse if it merely contains an infinite number of universes? Infinite sets can be different in size, so I think it is reasonable to think that there can be different multiverses, each containing its own distinct yet infinite set of universes.A multiverse includes everything that can possibly be imagined. Therefore, the MCU multiverse and the Star Wars multiverse exist within the D&D multiverse, and visa versa.
given that there is an infinite number, how does it not automatically contain every imaginable one (and then some)…I'm not sold on that. Must any given multiverse contain every imaginable universe? Isn't it still a multiverse if it merely contains an infinite number of universes?
Mathematically, an infinite set of things does not automatically contain everything in another infinite set of things. Click on the link in my previous post for an article on this topic.given that there is an infinite number, how does it not automatically contain every imaginable one (and then some)…
Same way the infinite set of Integers is smaller than the equally infinite set of Real numbers.given that there is an infinite number, how does it not automatically contain every imaginable one (and then some)…
This was actually helpful. Thanks!Etymology, it is latin, G is hard in Latin, it is never pronounced as a J sound. Comes from Sigillum, a sign or seal. Also Signature.
![]()
Etymology of "sigil" by etymonline
"a sign, mark, or seal," mid-15c., sigille, from Late Latin sigillum, from Latin sigilla… See origin and meaning of sigil.www.etymonline.com