• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Unpopular Geek Media Opinions

Serious question, you have cinema in your area that isn't showing everything on digital projectors?
I think the only chance I have of that around here is 1 small community single screen cinema wedged into the old downtown of a neighboring city.

Slight exaggeration on my part, not the last time I went to the movies, but when I went to see Bohemian Rhapsody when it came out, it was a digital projector. I think pretty much all the screens at that theater used digital at this point, but I didn't know that at the time until I saw the movie (I went in expecting to see something on film).

But to answer your question we do have little theaters around here that still use film. I really have been meaning to go to more showings at them. And some in Boston do as well. One of them played Dragon Inn like 8 years ago or so (one of my favorite movies)
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I've seen a number of directors make this point. There is something to be said for the theatrical experience. And certain movies are really different when you see them on the big screen
I remember this being a point made by a horror movie guide from the early 1980s. There's a real difference in experience with a horror movie in the theater vs watching on a television in your own familiar and comfortable home where you control the lighting level.
 

I just don't see cinema ever recovering fully.
Everything from studios pivoting from multiple mid to low budget flicks with a couple big budget spectaculars to everything being a big budget spectacular(yes I'm exaggerating), comfort and quality of home viewing, cost of going out, etc
So, I guess I am hoping streamers figure the movie thing out.

Of course, the same discussion happened when TV became a thing. And again when video cassettes came out. To a lesser extent when big screen TVs and high end home theaters started to become prevalent.

The movie industry must (and, mark my words, will) evolve, the same as all other industry. The fact that it is also an art form doesn't protect it from that fact any more that the music or photography industries that have also seen mass change over the last decades.
 

If it had instead been a big charity event, it would have made no difference at all to the actual story. Therefore: not a Christmas movie.
All of the Hallmark Christmas movies fail by this test.

And by this logic, if you moved most Westerns out of the west, they wouldn't be Westerns any more. But they are in the west and are therefore Westerns.

This seems like a rule specifically designed around Die Hard.
 

I don't think the argument about whether Christmas makes a difference to the plot is particularly relevant. I think what matters is how Christmas contributes to the atmosphere and feel of a movie. Also is there a Christmas tree in any scene or is Silent Night sung at any point during the film (I think the moment you insert a Christmas Tree into a film, it is just automatically a Christmas movie: it just overtakes everything).
Hans Gruber specifically refers to Christmasttime as "a time of miracles" when they're opening the vault.

The Christmas flavor is integrated through the film.
 

One of my issues with this though is it doesn't really work for me in a show format. Series are too long form. One of the things I love about movies is telling a story in that shorter time frame in a visual and audio medium. With shows, it is like they have too much room to breathe. Don't get me wrong, there are quality shows I like. I am just more into movies than series and there is a different feel between them.
I think it depends on the story your are telling. Sometimes you need the room to breath and develop a story slowly over time to give it the proper context. Other times, you are just finding filler to make hours of content stretch. I do think the binge viewing has impacted the documentary in a bad way. For many decades the documentary was a great way to give a detailed background on a subject. Now, they try to force it into extra hours of content. The McDs monopoly story for example, is very interesting but didn't need 5 hours to tell. For cinema, we are just not getting film length products like we used to.
In general everything feels very made for the moment and disposable these days to me. Part of that is probably that I am an old man, but I think the other part of it is that to get attention shows have to speak to the week they come out loudly. And there is so much competing for peoples attention that even if the movie or show is quality the memory probably gets drowned out the moment the viewer finishes and hops onto youtube for some shark videos.
It is disposable, and its not because you are old. When your business is 24/7 access to content, you gotta fill the demand or your customers will slip away. It's hard to pump out quanity while maintaining quality.
One thing streaming has done is make movies and shows very single serve. I don't talk about movies with my friends and family, let alone people at the water cooler anymore. It seems like most people are in their own little media bubble
yes and no. I talk quite a bit about prestige television series, but not much about films these days.
Where I have found enjoyment is moving away from steaming and not watching as many new films (still watch some things, but I am selective). Instead I focus on older movies or established classics, and doing that has just led to a better viewing experience for me
Nothing wrong with reviewing past films and/or discovering them.
 


One of my issues with this though is it doesn't really work for me in a show format. Series are too long form. One of the things I love about movies is telling a story in that shorter time frame in a visual and audio medium. With shows, it is like they have too much room to breathe. Don't get me wrong, there are quality shows I like. I am just more into movies than series and there is a different feel between them.

The best analogy I can think of is that, in literary terms, movies are short stories, while prestige series are novels.

The traditional movie is a one-off; it tells a story, briefly. It can ba amazing. It can be thought-provoking. It can evoke a world beyond the characters. But then it is done.

The series, on the other hand, luxuriates in its length. The characters become more complex, and the plot, instead of being about a single "event" becomes more of story, unfolding over time.

(I guess this makes the miniseries the novella, but that might stretch the analogy too far!)

I think that the big difference is that, for the most part, until the Sopranos era that we have entered, TV series usually did not attempt to tell a single unified story. They did not aspire to greatness, so much as to comfort.

As a collateral issue, I often run into the same problem when picking something to watch on streaming- for whatever reason, choosing a prestige series that is "one hour" episodes is fine, even knowing that I will binge two or three of them, while choosing a two-hour movie feels like too much of a commitment.
 



Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top