Elon Musk Calls for Wizards of the Coast to "Burn in Hell" Over Making of Original D&D Passages

Status
Not open for further replies.
elon musk.png


Elon Musk, the owner of the app formerly known as Twitter, is calling on Wizards of the Coast and its parent company Hasbro to "burn in hell" for the publication of Making of Original Dungeons & Dragons. On November 21st, former gaming executive turned culture warrior Mark Hern posted several passages from Making of Original Dungeons & Dragons on Twitter, criticizing the book for providing context about some of the misogyny and cultural insensitivity found in early rulebooks. These passages were pulled from the foreword written by Jason Tondro, a senior designer for the D&D team who also worked extensively on the book. Hern stated that these passages, along with the release of the new 2024 Player's Handbook and Dungeon Master's Guide for D&D's "40th anniversary" (it is actually D&D's 50th anniversary) both "erased and slandered" Gary Gygax and other creators of Dungeons & Dragons.

In response, Musk wrote "Nobody, and I mean nobody, gets to trash E. Gary Gygax and the geniuses who created Dungeons & Dragons. What the [naughty word] is wrong with Hasbro and WoTC?? May they burn in hell." Musk had played Dungeons & Dragons at some point in his youth, but it's unclear when the last time he ever played the game.

Nobody, and I mean nobody, gets to trash E. Gary Gygax and the geniuses who created Dungeons & Dragons. What the [xxxx] is wrong with Hasbro and WoTC?? May they burn in hell.
- Elon Musk​

Notably, Making of Original Dungeons & Dragons contains countless correspondences and letters written by both Gygax and Dave Arneson, including annotated copies of early D&D rulesets. Most early D&D rules supplements as well as early Dragon magazines are also found in the book. It seems odd to contain one of the most extensive compliations of Gygax's work an "erasure," but it's unclear whether Hern or Musk actually read the book given the incorrect information about the anniversary.

Additionally, Gygax and Arneson are both credited in the 2024 Player's Handbook and Dungeon Master's Guide. The exact credit reads: "Building on the original game created by Gary Gygax and Dave Arneson and then developed by many others over the past 50 years." Wizards of the Coast also regularly collaborates with Gygax's youngest son Luke and is a participant at Gary Con, a convention held in Gygax's honor. The opening paragraph of the 2024 Player's Handbook is written by Jeremy Crawford and specifically lauds both Gygax and Arneson for making Dungeons & Dragons and contains an anecdote about Crawford meeting Gygax.

Musk has increasingly leaned into culture war controversies in recent years, usually amplifying misinformation to suit his own political agenda.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Christian Hoffer

Christian Hoffer


log in or register to remove this ad

Really? I thought I was deeply polite, respectful, and direct. At no point did I call BedrockGames any names, demean, or insult. I wasn't even sarcastic in that particular post.

Not that it was enough to appease, clearly.
I don't think you were any of those things in that post, except maybe direct, but I'll take your word that you intended to be all of them.
 

Nope. Though, smaller companies only having men employed or only employed in important positions wasn't really uncommon in the time either was it?
no, but we weren’t talking about important positions either, we talked about men in every single position.

So him hiring one female among a staff of say 20 is him going out of his way to do so? Seems that is your conclusion

1. He paid for her travel. ("he flew me...")
common practice when hiring

2. As was fairly commonplace at the time people would have traveling guests stay at their home instead of going to a hotel (if there even was one nearby).
not a guest

3. He was married at the time with his Wife under that same roof.
4. There's been no insinuation by anyone involved that anything at all unprofessional happened between them.
nothing needs to happen for the situation to be a bit off
 

I don't think you were any of those things in that post, except maybe direct, but I'll take your word that you intended to be all of them.

It is entirely possible I misread the posts. I was sensing a lot of hostility and sarcasm which I why I asked for a change in tone. My goal wasn't to call out a poster though. I just was trying to express my frustration so it didn't become anger
 

no, but we weren’t talking about important positions either, we talked about men in every single position
I added context, no idea what you are getting at here.
common practice when hiring
Was it then? I don't actually know. I had assumed not but maybe I'm wrong.
not a guest
Of course she was. How do you figure otherwise?
nothing needs to happen for the situation to be a bit off
Such arrangements were common at the time. Nothing off about it.
 

It is entirely possible I misread the posts. I was sensing a lot of hostility and sarcasm which I why I asked for a change in tone. My goal wasn't to call out a poster though. I just was trying to express my frustration so it didn't become anger
I thought the same, but maybe it was just the directness getting in the way?
 

Of course she was. How do you figure otherwise?
what makes someone a guest, the fact that they stay at your house? Then you are arguing backwards.

A job applicant is not the same as your aunt or buddy staying over.

Such arrangements were common at the time. Nothing off about it.
for job interviews? I doubt it

Also, you did not answer this one ‘So him hiring one female among a staff of say 20 is him going out of his way to do so? Seems that is your conclusion’ Still think that has to be your conclusion…
 


what makes someone a guest, the fact that they stay at your house? Then you are arguing backwards.
That you invited them makes them a guest.
A job applicant is not the same as your aunt or buddy staying over.
Agreed, but not sure the point here?
for job interviews? I doubt it
Why do you doubt this? It was a very different time. People even still hitchhiked... ;)
 

Tone policing is famously a well loved and appreciated rhetorical dodge.
Being civil with people is a requirement here. Not being is also a surefire way to end the conversation anywhere. So yea, one can keep up bad tones, but one shouldn't expect others to put up with them for long.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Remove ads

Top