D&D General Drow & Orcs Removed from the Monster Manual

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, hypothetical or not, again I point out that it’s a three year old decision not to use that word.

Not so hypothetical - this has never come up in conversation before, but I went over and asked my wife, who is Jewish.

"Yeah, it is kinda anti-semitic."

In the contest of whose opinion I take - this guy on the internet, or my wife, guess who wins?

Another player at my table is Jewish. I'll be stopping by his place tonight. I may ask him too, to keep this less hypothetical.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

Not so hypothetical - this has never come up in conversation before, but went over and asked my wife, who is Jewish.

"Yeah, it is kinda anti-semitic."

In the contest of whose opinion I take - this guy on the internet, or my wife, guess who wins?

Another player at my table is Jewish. I'll be stopping by his place tonight. I may ask him too, to keep this less hypothetical.
That’s my take. I’m not Jewish, it didn’t occur to me that this term had those origins but I have a hard time believing that objections to this rose from a non-Jewish group of fans.
 



Not so hypothetical - this has never come up in conversation before, but went over and asked my wife, who is Jewish.

"Yeah, it is kinda anti-semitic."

In the contest of whose opinion I take - this guy on the internet, or my wife, guess who wins?

Another player at my table is Jewish. I'll be stopping by his place tonight. I may ask him too, to keep this less hypothetical.
The major point is as much the Blood Libel adjacent nature of the Lich, that compounds the base of "Phylactery." The Lich is literally doing what too many Jews throughout history down to today have been accused of doing: kidnapping innocents to ritually murder them to extend their lives.
 

And when the majority of a minority (or even a different minority of a minority) tells you that your non-sacrifice is to the detriment of their sensibilities, you seem okay with that too.

Well, of course when presented with a conflict of opinions, a reasonable person would have to take the sources into account.

Unless told otherwise, I will assume you would prefer I not go into that more deeply, for it would be getting personal.
 

The major point is as much the Blood Libel adjacent nature of the Lich, that compounds the base of "Phylactery." The Lich is literally doing what too many Jews throughout history down to today have been accused of doing: kidnapping innocents to ritually murder them to extend their lives.

She and I both understand that, though that wasn't necessary for my wife's assessment. The more basic point of liches being evil undead and referencing Judaica for their color (even with a non-Hebrew word) was sufficient.
 


Well, of course when presented with a conflict of opinions, a reasonable person would have to take the sources into account.

Unless told otherwise, I will assume you would prefer I not go into that more deeply, for it would be getting personal.
I mean, "don't make it personal" is one of the basic rules of conduct on this forum. I'm not sure why you'd even make a statement like this, short of a veiled reference to things you know you're not supposed to say on here. Maybe don't do that from now on?
 

It will always be certain that there's those that it bothers and those that it doesn't—people are funny that way. Both are valid. Is WotC over-correcting? Maybe? But I'm sure that they just want to avoid any more landmines like they had with Spelljammer. And, of course, they are late to the party (again)
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top