D&D General Drow & Orcs Removed from the Monster Manual

Status
Not open for further replies.

log in or register to remove this ad

This. This right here is what the debate is about. Why? Why does it impact you? You don't get to see a word you like in the printed book. That impacts your life. You admit that other terminology changes (magic user to wizard) aren't a problem, but this is. Most people will not even notice that change. Of those who do, few will even care. It shouldn't have warranted 50+ of discussion.
The changes they may impact all of us. It makes the new editions more or less viable. Again if it is a meaningless change to you, fair enough. I find changes that take our flavorful words like this have a big impact for me
 







I don't know why you think Europe is one culture. It isn't and the individual cultures of Europe are just as overwritten in favor of some romanticized version of the west.

Kara-Tur by the way, has Wa which is Japan, Shou Lung which is China, Malatra which is kinda Malaysia/India, Tabot which is Mongolia, The Northern Wastes which is Russia, and Bawa which would be pacific islanders. I don't see a Korea, but it didn't overwrite as much as you think, not that it did a ton of getting the various cultures right.
The races and most of the classes (save the barbarian, monk, and, to an extent, the wu-jen) in OA were "inspired" by Japan, at the cost of the cultures of most of Kara-Tur. And, even then, it was bad at Japan, too.
 

The races and most of the classes (save the barbarian, monk, and, to an extent, the wu-jen) in OA were "inspired" by Japan, at the cost of the cultures of most of Kara-Tur. And, even then, it was bad at Japan, too.
The 1e book, for sure. the 2e boxed set did a better job of creating separation and different cultures.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top