D&D General Drow & Orcs Removed from the Monster Manual

Status
Not open for further replies.
It is funny. In the past ten years the industry has absolutely exploded and expanded. To a degree unheard of previously.

And most of that expansion came from groups that previously had never participated in rpg gaming.

While correlation is not causation, it’s not really too much of a stretch to think by making gaming more welcoming to more people, more people have wanted to get into gaming.

It’s really not hard.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

It is funny. In the past ten years the industry has absolutely exploded and expanded. To a degree unheard of previously.

And most of that expansion came from groups that previously had never participated in rpg gaming.

While correlation is not causation, it’s not really too much of a stretch to think by making gaming more welcoming to more people, more people have wanted to get into gaming.

It’s really not hard.
Upthread someone - I think @Sepulchrave II - posted that their RPGing is not especially progressive. I would think of my own RPGing as being moderately sophisticated in a technical sense (I incorporate approaches and techniques that post-date the mid-1980s); but as far as themes and tropes go, it's nothing very special.

That said, even RPGs that are designed to appeal to someone like me - eg Burning Wheel - have changed in small ways over the past couple of decades, reflecting different ways of trying to engage with a semi-historical approach to fantasy mediaevalism.

And given that WotC is trying to grow its market to include people who weren't already engaging with the standard fantasy themes and tropes, why wouldn't it change the nature of what it publishes?
 




Vaults of Pandius along with our fellow Italian hobbyists are doing just fine without WotC's meddling.
But... but... but... how CAN this be possible!?!?

They use AI for artwork... after all. ;-)

1739451651165.png


For that alone they should be... well, I don't know... something bad. (j/k)
 


Has Pandius actually tried to adjust the Mongolian and First Nation orcs, do they just ignore them, or have they embraced the racist tropes in that book?
Pandius is a repository of ideas fleshed out for the setting and in particular exploring areas not covered by the Gazetteers as well as the setting's future. There is no revision.
You may have an alternate Duke Stefan Karameikos who is imagined as evil, but by and large the published material (Gazetteers, Hollow World and Red Curse/Savage Coast) and the articles of the Ark in one of the magazines (forget which) are gospel. Contributors add maps, discuss linguistics, flesh out history and timelines, provides education centres and trade routes...etc

The focus is to celebrate the richness of the setting.
I think it is predominantly supported/maintained by a European fanbase with a few fans in US and Asia.
 

Pandius is a repository of ideas fleshed out for the setting and in particular exploring areas not covered by the Gazetteers as well as the setting's future. There is no revision.
You may have an alternate Duke Stefan Karameikos who is imagined as evil, but by and large the published material (Gazetteers, Hollow World and Red Curse/Savage Coast) and the articles of the Ark in one of the magazines (forget which) are gospel. Contributors add maps, discuss linguistics, flesh out history and timelines...etc

The focus is to celebrate the richness of the setting.
I think it is predominantly supported/maintained by a European fanbase with a few fans in US and Asia.
I actually know what the site is. I was a frequenter in the 3e era. You didn't answer my question.
 


Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top