ezo
Hero
If WotC put that in a free book? Why complain?If WotC put that picture in any book, they would be crucified for it.
If WotC put that in a free book? Why complain?If WotC put that picture in any book, they would be crucified for it.
Only in Eberron. House Orien assures us.But do the trains run on time?
There is no revision.I actually know what the site is. I was a frequenter in the 3e era. You didn't answer my question.
Ah yes, AI slop is justified depending on how much money you are charging for it. Glad we have established that.If WotC put that in a free book? Why complain?
So they're fine with racist caricatures AND AI slop.There is no revision.
From their perception, I'd imagine, they are not embracing racists tropes, from your perceotion they are.
Capiche?
We can't all be excellent.So they're fine with racist caricatures AND AI slop.
Glad I stopped visiting a decade ago.
As far as I am concerned, yes. I have no issue with AI being used provided a company/person isn't getting paid for the material they use it in. A lot ot people put out free homebrew with AI art. I guess they should all be punished for it?Ah yes, AI slop is justified depending on how much money you are charging for it. Glad we have established that.
And I am so sure they miss you...Glad I stopped visiting a decade ago.
At least the "garbage" that WotC is putting out was made by real people who got paid to do it, rather than going cheap and effortlessly making stuff with prompts.Yeah, I am glad we established that! Frankly, most of the AI "slop" (as you call it) is superior to the garbage WoTC is putting into the new books. Fortunately, artwork preference is subjective--so you can keep calling it AI slop if you want and I'll keep calling the artwork in the new books garbage. How does that sound? Good? Good.
So we should have kept strength caps on women, but just as a sidebar? What about race as class, but just as a sidebar? We should keep blatently overpowered 3.5 subclasses, just as a sidebar?Anyside that refuses to compromise and insists their way is the right way I see as unreasonable.
Do you see the irony? I do.![]()