MarkB
Legend
More like "okay, try to return it intac- oh, who am I kidding, I'll get a replacement on order."
More like "okay, try to return it intac- oh, who am I kidding, I'll get a replacement on order."
Section 31 actually fits pretty well overall with DS9's break in Trek history. Being that this series was finally one that gave the Alpha quadrant's impression that Star Fleets excrement does in fact stink. I think its especially good since our beloved main characters hold up to the ideals of Star Fleet and flush S31 out the airlock as you say.Inquisition, on the other hand, has aged less well, I think. It's still a well-executed episode and the beginning of the Section 31 arc. I don't disagree that the Federation needs an intelligence service (and they already have one) but I don't see why they need a super-secret intelligence service that everyone pretends doesn't exist (but I presume anyone in the know does know that they exist) and which clearly takes such cynical glee in being allowed to break the rules and dress in black pleather Gestapo uniforms. As more familiar as we are these days with authoritarianism, I think I'm inclined to say that Section 31 is a terrible idea and should be flushed out of an airlock at the earliest opportunity.
(And to be fair, the narrative is pretty clear that anyone sane in Starfleet does think this and the story does end badly for Sloan and his ilk, but where vibes are concerned the writers are splitting the difference, with some love for the "hard men making hard decisions" approach on display. It's an interesting Watson/Doyle split.)
The Discovery era S31 however... dont get me started.(It also makes it a bit clearer to me why the recent TOS-era Section 31 movie took the approach it did, because the only way an ethical Federation can tolerate the existence of Section 31 is to have them be broken mavericks who send themselves off on suicide missions you couldn't order any Starfleet officer to do, and so they're more Guardians of the Galaxy than SS.)
Yeah, I haven't watched the film but it doesn't sound like I'm missing anything. But I can see why the approach they took made sense, just not the execution.Section 31 actually fits pretty well overall with DS9's break in Trek history. Being that this series was finally one that gave the Alpha quadrant's impression that Star Fleets excrement does in fact stink. I think its especially good since our beloved main characters hold up to the ideals of Star Fleet and flush S31 out the airlock as you say.
The Discovery era S31 however... dont get me started.
As awful as the Discovery era Section 31 is, I would argue that the Picard era Section 31 is even worse! They were conducting torturous experiments on living beings and putting others “on ice” in that black ops space station and so on.The Discovery era S31 however... dont get me started.
Agree completely on Section 31. It should have only existed long enough to show what a monumentally horrible idea it is, for an organization like The UFP, then been rooted out like the vermin they are. Starfleet doesn't need a Ministry of Dirty Tricks and it goes against everything that Roddenberry was trying to create in a hopeful future.Inquisition, on the other hand, has aged less well, I think. It's still a well-executed episode and the beginning of the Section 31 arc. I don't disagree that the Federation needs an intelligence service (and they already have one) but I don't see why they need a super-secret intelligence service that everyone pretends doesn't exist (but I presume anyone in the know does know that they exist) and which clearly takes such cynical glee in being allowed to break the rules and dress in black pleather Gestapo uniforms. As more familiar as we are these days with authoritarianism, I think I'm inclined to say that Section 31 is a terrible idea and should be flushed out of an airlock at the earliest opportunity.
(And to be fair, the narrative is pretty clear that anyone sane in Starfleet does think this and the story does end badly for Sloan and his ilk, but where vibes are concerned the writers are splitting the difference, with some love for the "hard men making hard decisions" approach on display. It's an interesting Watson/Doyle split.)
(It also makes it a bit clearer to me why the recent TOS-era Section 31 movie took the approach it did, because the only way an ethical Federation can tolerate the existence of Section 31 is to have them be broken mavericks who send themselves off on suicide missions you couldn't order any Starfleet officer to do, and so they're more Guardians of the Galaxy than SS.)
I wouldn't be entirely surprised if, while Section 31 has technically existed since the foundation of the Federation (like the Culper Ring or something), the version shown was put together very quickly as a response to the Dominion War, which is arguably the first overwhelming existential threat the Federation has faced for which having a Ministry of Pissing About might actually be helpful (it probably wouldn't have been any use against the Borg). It's still a terrible idea but mostly the result of institutional panic.Agree completely on Section 31. It should have only existed long enough to show what a monumentally horrible idea it is, for an organization like The UFP, then been rooted out like the vermin they are. Starfleet doesn't need a Ministry of Dirty Tricks and it goes against everything that Roddenberry was trying to create in a hopeful future.
Thats... a good point. I think the DS9 S31 was implied to be capable and likely doing this kind of thing, but it was off screen. You didnt really know how big S31 was, or how terrible, Sloan was sort of the only window into it. I liked it better that way. Especially, since it served no purpose in Picard other than to give motivation to the villain.As awful as the Discovery era Section 31 is, I would argue that the Picard era Section 31 is even worse! They were conducting torturous experiments on living beings and putting others “on ice” in that black ops space station and so on.