• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

D&D 5E The Nature of the Shield Spell

lonelynoose

First Post
If it's a floating shield that moves and turns to protect you, that could protect your back with the same AC bonus. The argument against surrounding field is that Shield doesn't block or even reduce area effects like Fireball.

Fireball doesn't emanate from a central point. It engulfs a whole area simultaneously. Including within your shield, aka the space your body occupies. We know this because all those within take equal damage.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

cbwjm

Seb-wejem
When cast I imagine it like the shields in the movie Doctor Strange. I don't tend to worry too much about how it looks for the rest of the round but perhaps I could imagine that a single casting of the spell enables you to create multiple shields until the start of your next turn.

I also agree that the player doesn't need to know the actual AC hit by an attacker, just whether or not the attack was a hit. It's possible that the hostile creature rolled high enough that a shield spell won't help, it's up to the player to decide if they want to spend the spell slot and find out.
 

FarBeyondC

Explorer
I also agree that the player doesn't need to know the actual AC hit by an attacker, just whether or not the attack was a hit.

Aside from the attacker rolling a natural 20, how does the DM know an attack actually hit in the first place (without having the particular player's AC on hand, that is)?
 

cbwjm

Seb-wejem
Aside from the attacker rolling a natural 20, how does the DM know an attack actually hit in the first place (without having the particular player's AC on hand, that is)?
If you don't already have it on hand then you ask the player what their AC is and then tell them if it's a hit or not. The actual to hit roll number doesn't need to be mentioned.
 

Fireball doesn't emanate from a central point. It engulfs a whole area simultaneously. Including within your shield, aka the space your body occupies. We know this because all those within take equal damage.

According to the actual RAW, Fireball does NOT engulf an entire area simultaneously (it's an explosion that spreads from a point - the spell's text actually says this) and those within do NOT necessarily take equal damage (half damage on a save or less, reduced to zero on a save with Evasion).
 

pukunui

Legend
I know the spell's description says it's invisible but the elf lady in this image from Princes of the Apocalypse appears to be casting the shield spell.

Princes of the Apocalypse-189.jpg
 

Caliban

Rules Monkey
According to the actual RAW, Fireball does NOT engulf an entire area simultaneously (it's an explosion that spreads from a point - the spell's text actually says this) and those within do NOT necessarily take equal damage (half damage on a save or less, reduced to zero on a save with Evasion).

This. Plus, if it covered the entire area simultaneously, cover wouldn't grant you a bonus to your Dexterity save (+2 for half cover, +5 for 3/4 cover). Sacred Flame explicitly ignores cover, but Fireball does not.
 

Caliban

Rules Monkey
I think technically, the caster of Shield only knows if they get hit, but not by how much. That being said, I will let them know what AC the attack hit, and every other DM I know in Adventure League does the same thing. But it's really the DM's call.
 

Azzy

ᚳᚣᚾᛖᚹᚢᛚᚠ
And this is what happens when friends let friends overthink D&D. *slaps all of you with a wet trout*
 

I just tell the players that they are hit. If I remember that they can cast shield. I speak of a good hit. Otherwise they just ask me and I tell them. Sometimes my answer is vague. Then the caster may take the risk of wasting the spell.
 

Remove ads

Top