Leatherhead
Possibly a Idiot.
That's how 4e handled it!
D&D General A Class's Spell List Should be Listed With the Class Description.
W'rkncacnter
Hero
i was about to say, 4e strikes again.
Leatherhead
Possibly a Idiot.
Now that I find hard to believe, you have never looked up a spell, only to have a different spell on the same or opposite page catch your eye?
Argyle King
Legend
Spell List - yes (with a page number in parentheses)
Spell Description- not necessarily
Edit: I would also be okay with class spell lists (and similar things) all being in an appendix at the back of the book.
Having a useful appendices, a better index, and other such "normal" parts of a book would be a big improvement over the original PHB.
Spell Description- not necessarily
Edit: I would also be okay with class spell lists (and similar things) all being in an appendix at the back of the book.
Having a useful appendices, a better index, and other such "normal" parts of a book would be a big improvement over the original PHB.
el-remmen
Moderator Emeritus
I mean that’s nice if it works for you. But I spend so much time on a computer and other electronics that I like to just spread out on a table with a notebook and books to do prep and consider anytime I need to bust out the laptop during a game (except for virtual games of course) a failure.
Vaalingrade
Legend
By... adding characters to the already existing Level line and thus not adding any pages at all?
overgeeked
B/X Known World
No. It would only make referencing the spell lists harder. Having them all in one place works easier for looking things up.
el-remmen
Moderator Emeritus
Much more likely as a DM than as a player. But yeah, that has happened but I never wondered if it was part of the class list.
overgeeked
B/X Known World
Another example of how 4E was ahead of its time.
Similar Threads
