Scribe
Legend
I have a paid sub so I don't know. I do know it's new as of today.
Well, its very cool. I was thinking it was prompts at first, which really blew me away.
I have a paid sub so I don't know. I do know it's new as of today.
Ah! OK cool, an i2i gen.No i upload an image of the first printing of the AD&D Player's Handbook and ask it to redo the image in the style of Studio Ghibli.
I also uploaded an image of my kid and had it redo the image in the style of studio ghibli and that worked great too.
I'd be interested what it made of this:If anyone has a suggestion for another image that should be converted to this animation style let me know
If anyone has a suggestion for another image that should be converted to this animation style let me know
It did poorly with this one, perhaps because it is complicated. It seemed unable to identify all of the distinct figures and rather than rendering all 9 of the most prominent ones it tried to reduce it to seven while eliminating most of the "heroes" in the image. I then gave it some more specific instructions describing a few of the elements, and it still mucked it up. But here it is:
The skyship and the main gnoll look decent. It appears it tried to pull an obscure figure from the background and make it more prominent, creating a some kind of dwarf-bird monstrosity.It did poorly with this one, perhaps because it is complicated. It seemed unable to identify all of the distinct figures and rather than rendering all 9 of the most prominent ones it tried to reduce it to seven while eliminating most of the "heroes" in the image. I then gave it some more specific instructions describing a few of the elements, and it still mucked it up. But here it is:
View attachment 400817
It did poorly with this one, perhaps because it is complicated. It seemed unable to identify all of the distinct figures and rather than rendering all 9 of the most prominent ones it tried to reduce it to seven while eliminating most of the "heroes" in the image. I then gave it some more specific instructions describing a few of the elements, and it still mucked it up. But here it is: