Search results

half celestial/half wood elf psychic warrior, THE POWER!!!!!!!!!!

My spell DC are at the same time decently high and pretty low. Nowhere near maximized though, I coulda eeked out an extra 6+ onto all of the DC's if I wanted to but it just didn't fit everything I wanted to do.

I have bad feelings about anything mongoose unfortunately so I don't own the books. I don't know about giving any kind of defensive bonus to the attack that caused the roll over but there is good cause to have a defensive bonus of some type for attacks after that if the PW keeps spinning around.

bah, rog/wiz. Mostly cuz I hate bards and think they were poorly written. Hope the 3.5 one is better, but for some reason I doubt it will be just by giving more skill points and fiddling with the spell list. Anyways, rog/wiz and go for arcane trickster if your dm will allow it. If he won't allow...

Stronghold Builders Guidebook. It's a wonderful book.

Most of the people treat Skip as if everytime he makes a ruling he crumbled their entire prescious little world. It's kinda funny to see people blow up and overload everytime Skip says or does something.

As a side note, most things that you did gave an experience award in 1st edition. Like for fighters it was defeating a monster based on it's hit dice or something and for magic users it was for casting a spell and thieves it was for using their thieving abilities correctly. Atleast I think I am...

I said it was awesome. I love it and use it instead of the PHB paladin. I just tweak the sword a bit because my campaigns are a bit harder to survive so I bring it up to par a bit with the pluses and such.

They are identical in effect but not in named bonus type. One is unnamed (the boots) and the other is enhancement (expeditious retreat). Now as for letting them stack I still think it is far fetched to let them both stack even though by the rules they should be allowed to be stacked. Just seems...

Read the spells. Fireball says anything that is combustible in the area of the spell gets set on fire. Same thing with burning hands. Now I'm not saying that it sets creatures on fire or the objects carried by creatures. I'm just saying that if a pile of clothes, yes clothes are combustible, are...

Well since formians have a hive mind and since when you summon one you take it away from the hive mentality that it would fight just like any other single minded creature. The way that creature fights itself. It is completely different going up against something that can only think for itself...

Actually there is a difference between 1d4+1 and 50+1d10%. The variable is before the number that is added onto. If it was 1d10%+50 then I would say ok, it would be more then 5%. If it was 1d10%+50 then that would make the variable number from 51-60. When it is 50+1d10% the variable number is 1-10.

Simple, if I don't think it would be good then you just sound out the word "No". Repeat after me, Nnnnnnooooooo. See? Simple isn't it? Seriously, I guess I am kinda blunt about it. I just say no. If a reason is asked I explain.

Actually first empower and the spell is 9th level already since it is a 7th level spell normally. And yep, only a 5% increase, not anywhere near much help. Especially for blowing a 9th level spell or spell slot on it.

It says in the descriptions of the spells that both burning hands and fireball set combustibles on fire. Course I only enforce that rule to unattended objects. I mean, every adventurer would be bald. Which adventurer hasn't been subjected to being in the blast of a fireball?

360'

tree tokens!!!!! =o) those things rock and ya can get 5 of em for book price!

what creeper said

AuraSeer said it a bit clearer then I did. I was thinking along the same lines they were.

Either I would say that the second spell cast from either of those spells just fizzles and doesn't seem to take effect or that they would just get 8 points of subdual damage. Since the damage came from a lethal source, they were hit for lethal damage on purpose. The 8 lethal hitpoints would get...