Search results

I see EN World too has started to delete posts; it must be to attract more casual spammers and casual readers, forgetting those who spammed and flamed for years!

You have to be more precise about the statement "changing for the sake of change" as it could be translated into, pick one: -They are changing for the sake of change because that will make them sell a brand new edition -aka, they are changing for Money; laugh or cry, tell it's because they...

I have already expressed a short negative position, but after reading some of the posts I must say the thing that angers me most is that "3.5 sucks, 4E is the answer, you have to trust us! (yes i said trust because we don't give you enough information to understand how the system works, just...

4E is neither winning or losing me 'cause it lost me from the beginning (I could even say "before it was announced") At least I'm not alone in the darkness

Read my sig

Look, it's not hard to spell ;)

As a Planescape fan, I hate seeing the word "Eladrin" used for something different from a CG celestial (hell, fantasy is filled with exotic/arcane names, just find one yourself). Not to mention that this "Eladrin" will be either an elven subrace or a revision of the "Aasimar". The first...

I think it will be "rather easy" to implement some 4E elements in 3.5, since what I've seen for now of valuable are just marginal things with no great effect upon the game system

Now that I read your link, I must say I confused a revision for another. I am sorry, it was long time ago -ToT must have been a real trauma-

I just remembered when D&D passed from 2E to 3E. To explain the changes, the Wizards'guys created the Time of Troubles. The fanbase asked -some angrily, some in their knees- not to repeat such mess/nonsense, 'cause it screwed the majority of FR campaigns -mine included- in terms of logic...

For me, more than to wait for bugfixing, it is wait to be sure what we buy lasts for more than the span 3.0-3.5. I was with those who said "3 years to re-buy all rulebooks are just too few"

/signed

It was said during the first presentation of 4E, published on WotC official D&D site, as the answer to the question: "Why no one said 4E was being developed?". I was not able to find that particular article (made by a developer) anymore, but unless they removed it, it exists. Since I'm not...

I'll welcome everything about 4E which is free, but nothing else

I must say I'd trust WotC without the fact they switched to 3.5 after 3 years, and always denied they were working on 4E "for the sake of business". Lol, that one is wonderful :p ... For the sake "of my wallet and my nerves", I'd answer, I won't trust or buy anything from you regardless...

Have you read Unarthed Arcana? There you will find countless ways to re-balance and diversify classes, spell system, races, everything, all in 250 pages. If you want to apply sets of different rules you keep the PHB as a source, and use it as the new rules intend

Why should anyone want a new edition with 3.5? And another question: why a new edition while the changes to the system are so few they could be integrated in 3.5? My personal answer is: as long as 3.5 would support all the changes they want to make, no new edition is necessary, unless you...

Re This was discussed long ago, and the FAQ clarified it as follows: Spring attack lets you make an "attack action" while you move, not a standard action; hence, a single attack of any kind (even starting a grapple). You can convert a standard action into an attack action, but not vice...

Read my sig

I totally agree with Matthias about the skill modifications, as do my group (though we play Ravenloft). A so-simplified skill system makes impossible to portray all non-heroic characters from every setting. I know Star Wars (which we played) is much more heroic than Ravenloft, but, huh, never...