Search results

I understand that subclasses are out the question right? Maybe the new Armour table?

Thanks a lot for your response @Morrus Not sure I agree with the implementation (namely the removal of the 4th attack which was a very iconic feature) but thanks a lot nevertheless.

The fighter please. Thanks a lot.

How about these: https://i.imgur.com/tqRKR5v.png https://i.imgur.com/rFbnPhd.png

To anyone having issues, i reuploaded the images on imgur here. Maybe it helps?

I have been very satisfied with the way Level up handles races and the dragonborn are not an exception. My only disappointment is that you cannot fly in medium or heavy armor. Once more Str based builds are getting gimped in a dnd 5e derivative. It should have been based on encumberance.

Then maybe it should be The spawn, instead of the vampire?

Love it. A small correction in the Regeneration entry of the vampire spawn. It says that "the vampire regenerates 10 hp" the entry should say "the vampire SPAWN regenerates 10 hp...". The same occurs in the Monster Manual.

@Morrus @dave2008 my main concern is that monster hp skyrockets around cr 1/2 and cr 2 and then increases at a steady pace (15 hp per CR up to CR 19) all of a sudden you can have cr 1 or 2 creatures with 100 hp but a cr 8 creature can have like 150. This compared with the way that hp increase...

I see an increase in hp and armor class all over the board. I cannot say that this pleases me unless there is an equivalent effect in the output of the pcs. HP bloat is an issue with this edition. Will LU increase it even further?

Can I ask some more insight regarding how CR is calculated? The Rakshasha is of the same CR in 5e and Level up however the level up has almost +50% hit points and a much more interesting reaction. TIA.

I know it would break with the alphabetical progress of previews but @Morrus could we have an NPC statblock like the gladiator or something similar please?

@Morrus just a heads up the dragon's strength is written as 6 instead of 26. ;)

Hmmm. Have your removed the fourth attack from the fighter or have you moved it to 17th level? Also the ranger one feels a bit underwhelming? Perhaps let you keep one elemental as a companion permanently that gets resurrected/changed on a long or short rest?

Thanks @Morrus and @duneguy :D

@Morrus hey can you confirm that the death knight is indeed not supposed to get multiattack and can attack only once per round (+1 as a bonus action) thanks.

Either is fine by me. I can truly see merit in both. However what I would suggest is to actually put the page number next to the spell name. What I mean by that? A quick description is nice and dandy but in my wizard spell list I would like to see something like what i have done above.

I would love to see how the fighter is shaping compared to what we originally saw. The more martial or "half-martial" classes you introduce the more I think that the fighter is left without a niche especially after you removed Action Surge which is the classes most iconic feature until level 11...

I agree with your Sentiment Horwath. I would take it one step further. Make a large list of class agnostic knacks that everyone can choose from and a few unique ones that are class specific.

I don't want to digress. One of my issues with the 5e fighter is that until level 11 where they get their third attack they are practically inferior versions of the paladin, the ranger and the barbarian unless they go battlemaster. Everything that they can the three aforementioned classes can do...