Enrahim2
Adventurer
I think the first short phrasing of the situation was that ogl1.1 "came with enforceable contracts". In the larger context where this was first coined, it was clear that these contacts refered to the "sweetheart deals". But that catchphrase do not clarify that, so it seem people have construed the contract in question to be the ogl itself.That could be and it makes some sense; however, that is not how it is be construed by a lot of people talking about it.
I guess I would like the smoking gun, that I may never get.
Moreover I don't think I have seen any primary sources refering to a signature field either, so I suspect that is also a level of someone down the information chain expanding based on how they imagine an "enforceable contract" to look like.