Particle_Man
Explorer
In 1st ed AD&D, part of the charm of the
illusionist was that her spells were very
different. She had spells on her list that the Magic-User (old name for Wizard) did not have, or had at higher levels. In addition, some spells, like Shadow Conjuration, were much more flexible in the creatures that could be summoned.
Now, there is an illusionist in 3rd ed. But a generalist wizard would be able to cast all the same spells at the same level, and some spells are no longer illusionist spells (like the prismatic ones), and shadow conjuration has been changed.
I am not arguing that the 3d ed. illusionist is too weak or anything. But the style is different. Now she is just another wizard.
Has anyone tried a 3rd ed. version of the illusionist that is closer in "Feel" to the 1st ed. illusionist? Or is this just a pipe dream?
illusionist was that her spells were very
different. She had spells on her list that the Magic-User (old name for Wizard) did not have, or had at higher levels. In addition, some spells, like Shadow Conjuration, were much more flexible in the creatures that could be summoned.
Now, there is an illusionist in 3rd ed. But a generalist wizard would be able to cast all the same spells at the same level, and some spells are no longer illusionist spells (like the prismatic ones), and shadow conjuration has been changed.
I am not arguing that the 3d ed. illusionist is too weak or anything. But the style is different. Now she is just another wizard.
Has anyone tried a 3rd ed. version of the illusionist that is closer in "Feel" to the 1st ed. illusionist? Or is this just a pipe dream?