'24'? - 2/10/2003

[Airwolf]

Jack has already killed one person in cold blood will he now kill a child, how does it turn out?

 

[Sagan Darkside]

*shrug* I will wait and see.

If he does go through with it and the president pardons him, then the president's career is over. Which is likely the case anyway- between the coup and his own choices.

SD

 

[Welverin]

kid? what kid? i don't remember any kid.

Jack has already killed one person in cold blood will he now kill a child, how does it turn out?

Um, excuse me, but how the hell does Jack's killing a criminal at the beginning of the season lead to speculation on him killing child?

Yes Jack's bad ass and willing to do things others are unwilling to do when necessary, but he hasn't killed a single person or even hurt anyone in either season that hasn't committed some kind of crime already.

 

[Airwolf]

Re: kid? what kid? i don't remember any kid.

Um, excuse me, but how the hell does Jack's killing a criminal at the beginning of the season lead to speculation on him killing child?

In the promos for tonight’s episode it shows Jack threatening to kill the terrorist's kid. So, the speculation comes from the show itself.

Yes Jack's bad ass and willing to do things others are unwilling to do when necessary, but he hasn't killed a single person or even hurt anyone in either season that hasn't committed some kind of crime already.

When someone is chained to a chair, criminal or not, shooting him at point blank range qualifies as killing in cold blood, at least in my book.
Using your line of reason, it would be okay for the cops to shoot all criminals, no matter what the crime was. Perhaps that is not what you were implying but it’s the way I read it.

Personally I think the police shoot far to many people already.

Thanks for the feedback.


Regards,
Airwolf

 

[Sagan Darkside]

Re: kid? what kid? i don't remember any kid.

Yes Jack's bad ass and willing to do things others are unwilling to do when necessary, but he hasn't killed a single person or even hurt anyone in either season that hasn't committed some kind of crime already.

I only saw the last third of the first season, but didn't he take an innocent women as a shield/hostage that led to her immediate death?

And while I think the guy in the beginning deserved to die- I would have preferred a public hanging. heehee.

SD

 

[Sagan Darkside]

Clever... very clever...

Poor little evil cute girl

SD

 

[Welverin]

Re: Re: kid? what kid? i don't remember any kid.

In the promos for tonight?s episode it shows Jack threatening to kill the terrorist's kid. So, the speculation comes from the show itself.

I?ll start by saying your first post made it sound like his killing the guy at the beginning was reason to think he would kill a kid. They are not the same thing and killing a child or any other innocent (relatively speaking) person isn?t in Jack?s character, and as we saw he didn't actually do it.

When someone is chained to a chair, criminal or not, shooting him at point blank range qualifies as killing in cold blood, at least in my book.

Yeah I suppose, but I've always found the phrase ridiculous. He killed what difference does the situation make? Either it?s wrong to kill him or it?s not. The way I see it whether he?s handcuffed to a chair or not is irrelevant, but the type of person he is does.

I only saw the last third of the first season, but didn't he take an innocent women as a shield/hostage that led to her immediate death?

I don?t remember, but I doubt it, for the same reason I knew he wouldn?t have the kid killed.