mouseferatu said:
I've tried. IME, it bogs things down dramatically, encourages math-crunching and rules-lawyering over playing, makes people less inclined to try creative maneuvers in combat, and in general makes combat slower and less enjoyable.
Again, that's IME only, of course.
KenM said:
The thing that worries me is if Wizards says "you can only use offical minis to play DnD" that will be total BS.
Another, relatively, inexpensive method is the various cardboard cutouts (Ooh, I wonder if this new focus will mean they'll redo Strongholds and Castles!) and PDF's of buildings and whatnot like Dirt Cheep Dungeons (www.microtactix.com).Mark said:You keep saying that, Olive, and I have one word for you, "Counters"They're the inexpensive alternative that serve just as well as minis if the funds are low or the deal that a minis' company is out of line, which, IMO, a collectible game is for us common gamers that are not collecting armies or playing such games. Hell. You can even make them youself, as I often do to create the proper size mounts for minis that stand. *shrug*
Olive said:
sure it will be, but it will also be completely unenforcable except in Wizards run tornaments, and how often do most people play in those? they're not going to be coming round and making spot checks on your games.
Son of Pelor said:
Wow. And here I thought the current rules were about as miniatures-oriented as you can get.
Snoweel said:
I think KenM was kidding. BTW, how was your trip to Sydney?