Possibly a limitation for the minimum size of a hardback due to the spine. There's 1E modules as small as 8 and 16 pages. As noted above most printers require a signature of at least 4 (2 sheets of 8½X11, front and back) or 8 pages (known as a "signature") is the smallest block of pages you can do. So we'd see books in pages of 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72 or such.
He didn't say that it was divisible by 32. He pointed that 32 seems to be the minimum number of pages WoTC will have in any of it's books.
I hope that the Planescape book will be as thick as Keys From the Golden Vault. You can't describe the planes and their planar inhabitants in just 32 pages. 
Very few people know the original derivation of 'berk' - it's seen as very mild (and now rather old-fashioned). IIRC, it was even allowed in Parliament, until some spoilsport alerted the officials to the original meaning.
He was quoting this post by @TheGlenHe didn't say that it was divisible by 32. He pointed that 32 seems to be the minimum number of pages WoTC will have in any of it's books.
Berk comes from the rhyming slang of "Berkeley Hunt" which rhymes with a word that can refer to a part of the female anatomy.
Does anyone remember what Berk referred to in the Planescape setting?
From Sigil and Beyond: "A fool, especially one who got himself into the mess when he should have known better."
If we're lucky, maybe WoTC will update 3e's Manual of the Planes to 5e. I liked how that book mentioned what kind of gravity each plane had (objective vs subjective) and how each plane affected the nature of certain spells (heightening spells with one kind of descriptor while diminishing spells with another kind of descriptor). The latter in 5e will probably involve casting spells with Advantage or Disadvantage.
Manual of the Planes is still my go to reference when creating planar adventures. Using it heavily now in my homebrew Sigil campaign.If we're lucky, maybe WoTC will update 3e's Manual of the Planes to 5e. I liked how that book mentioned what kind of gravity each plane had (objective vs subjective) and how each plane affected the nature of certain spells (heightening spells with one kind of descriptor while diminishing spells with another kind of descriptor). The latter in 5e will probably involve casting spells with Advantage or Disadvantage.
And while Alignment is not a big thing as it was in previous editions, Alignment did play a big part in the Outer Planes as well. For instance, the third layer of Arcadia was lost to Mechanus when the Harmonium tried to force Chaotic beings into being Lawful in nature. As a result, there was an alignment shift and an entire layer slipped away. Oops!
That definition does not exclude a word that describes a part of the female anatomy. As I know a bunch of people from the UK, Ireland, Australia and New Zealand, who might call such a person a word describing a part of the female anatomy.
Yeah, the term was usually used to describe Primes who thought they knew all they needed to know about the planes, only to come up short at the wrong moment.
For me, I just don't see at as necessary. There's room for all sorts of planes. And, I think it's very in character for Planescape to take the idea that there's really no limit to the kinds of planes that might be out there. I mean, this is a game where Neth exists. Go wild. But the specific list of planes is a lot less important to me than the approach to gameplay that involves looking at the vastness of multiple infinite cosmic eternities and kind of squinting and going "Well. It's all right, I guess, innit?" And that's more about Sigil, Factions, and character design than it is about what planes there really are.
Yeah this is important - the unsettling, dark and grimy side should be there. Not just the "FUN WACKY ADVENTURES LOLZ!". It's not like it needs to be hugely dark - just enough not to be twee or purely "zany".
