D&D 5E 5e's new gender policy - is it attracting new players?

Status
Not open for further replies.
It doesn't HAVE to be, but, asides from RL considerations of inclusion, can be an enrichment for a game world. If I create a world, not every place is the same. Maybe it's ok and even the norm for the Deep Dwarfs to live in homo relationships, male couples raising the boys and females the girls. Yet the Hill Dwarfs only think it fine if both of the couple is infertile, or the Silver Elves don't allow it because there are so many of them left and they need couples to produce children. And maybe the Lowland Halflings don't even live as couples of any kind, but in married groups of 5 or 6, and male and female are just concepts to go by if they want offspring.

There was a set of captioned gifs I saw once from something (I think Sleepy Hollow maybe?) where someone who has been out of touch with our society for a very long time indicates two people and says "is that kind of thing acceptable now?", and gets a nice little lecture about same-sex couples and acceptance and tolerance, to which he responds "I meant men wearing hats indoors."
 

log in or register to remove this ad

There was a set of captioned gifs I saw once from something (I think Sleepy Hollow maybe?) where someone who has been out of touch with our society for a very long time indicates two people and says "is that kind of thing acceptable now?", and gets a nice little lecture about same-sex couples and acceptance and tolerance, to which he responds "I meant men wearing hats indoors."
Man, that show. What a waste. Ichabod Crane's observations of modern culture and politics are always so hilarious, and the actual plots are always so boring. It would have been much better if he was just solving mundane crimes. A little like New Amsterdam, I guess.
 

Yup. All disaster movies are the same. Against the backdrop of utter destruction, the most inane and pointless dialogue takes place. This was captured to perfection in the spoof : THATS ARMAGEDDON!


The Nurse: Leave her... come back to Montana with me.

The Architect: I could no sooner run away from her than myself.

The Nurse: I'm not asking you to run, I'm asking you to face reality!

The Architect: Whose reality, yours or mine?

The Nurse: My reality AND yours, that's whose!

The Architect: What are you saying?

The Nurse: Leave her! Come back to Montana with me!

The Architect: I could no more run away from her than I could run away from myself!

The Nurse: I'm not asking you to run, I'm asking you to face reality!

The Architect: Whose reality, yours or mine?

The Nurse: MY reality AND yours, that's whose!

The Architect: What are you saying?

What point are you trying to make?

How is any f that relevant t what you quoted?
 


There was a set of captioned gifs I saw once from something (I think Sleepy Hollow maybe?) where someone who has been out of touch with our society for a very long time indicates two people and says "is that kind of thing acceptable now?", and gets a nice little lecture about same-sex couples and acceptance and tolerance, to which he responds "I meant men wearing hats indoors."

That just made my night :cool:
 

It's about as relevant as you citing alien invasion movies as examples of realistic facets of life.

Except that we are talking about fictional worlds and how we interact with them, so my point was 100% relevant to the discussion.

That aside, art reflects life. In real life, people care about their loved ones, and seek them out in times of crisis. In times of existential crisis, as in giant disasters, or invading armies, or whathaveyou, we seek them out to try and keep them safe, or in order to not leave them behind on our way out of the danger zone.
If, in that sort of scenario, an adventure doesn't feature any mention whatsoever of anyone's family, spouse, lover, etc, then that adventure is failing, by going out of it's way to ignore one of the most important aspects of life.
If it does make mention of such things, the sexual preferences and identities of characters will come up. There is no way to avoid that without avoiding showing the basic humanity of the characters in the adventure/novel/whatever.
 


Again I have to ask. Is anyone actually bothered if one of the couples in a module is a same sex couple?

Yes. Some people are actually bothered by it. Just like there was outrage over the lesbian scene in the first Mass Effect, there will be outrage over a gay couple in a module.

You can't please everyone. If you choose to be inclusive of LGBT people, you need to accept that you're going to tick some people off.
 


It actually has a significant impact on the community, because it sets an expectation. People who would be inclined to be abusive towards other people over sexuality tend to feel they wouldn't really enjoy the community, people who are used to getting harassed at social things tend to feel like they'd be more welcome. It has a noticeable effect on what people think the community is expected to be like.

FWIW, about half of my gaming group is trans, and we've all been long-term gamers, but I've definitely noticed a shift in the overall tone of the D&D community over the ages, and I am all for it.

I don't know if it it actually works, but it seems a reasonable start to make it clear in your game rules that "non-standard" forms of sexuality or gender identification are accepted.
Even if the game setting itself might have the expected "backwards" pseudo-medieval social standards (beginning from Nobility being seen as inherently better than regular people, over women being only used to marry away and have children, to gays being seen as abominations and what not), we players should not.

Yes. Some people are actually bothered by it. Just like there was outrage over the lesbian scene in the first Mass Effect, there will be outrage over a gay couple in a module.

You can't please everyone. If you choose to be inclusive of LGBT people, you need to accept that you're going to tick some people off.


And over time, the people you tick off will be less and less, as people get used to the unfamiliar. Which is pretty much the whole point of doing it in the first place.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top