Infiniti2000
First Post
Thus proving he's not actually extremely reasonable.mvincent said:I've had an (extremely reasonable) DM ban my use of reach weapons before.

Thus proving he's not actually extremely reasonable.mvincent said:I've had an (extremely reasonable) DM ban my use of reach weapons before.
Not even that if your enhancement bonuses are normally obtained from the party's cleric buffing everyone with magic vestments.FreeTheSlaves said:Then the animated shield came along and he was going to get my schtick at only 2 pt AC cost....
You'd think, but given how we were using the reach weapons, I was somewhat sympathetic to his ruling. It was not completely unjustified.Infiniti2000 said:Thus proving he's not actually extremely reasonable.![]()
Well yeah, sure. That is would be adding insult to injury, but my point would stand even without magic vestment.mvincent said:Not even that if your enhancement bonuses are normally obtained from the party's cleric buffing everyone with magic vestments.
FreeTheSlaves said:Well yeah, sure. That is would be adding insult to injury, but my point would stand even without magic vestment.
I like the idea of 'dancing' because you have to do the 3 rds of it and that's a serious commitment in combat. Basically it would turn the no brainer element into tactical thinking with advantages/disadvantages - and that is part of d&d that excites me.![]()
Kmart Kommando said:Try an animated, bashing, slinging, returning, dancing shield. you flip it at someone, it keeps flting over and hitting them, and you still get the AC bonus.Kraft Shield, it's the cheesiest!
How were you using reach weapons that was so flatulently abusive of the rules? I may want to try the same tricks on my DM.mvincent said:You'd think, but given how we were using the reach weapons, I was somewhat sympathetic to his ruling. It was not completely unjustified.