D&D 5E Another Fighter: the "Heroic" Fighter

[Vaalingrade]

Sure, I agree with others a good Warlord subclass and others could help make fighters who do have more focus for exploration and social pillars, I just don't think that needs to be "core" to the class.

I know it the other thread people sometimes equate such things to "mind control magic", but I don't see it that way if you flavor it correctly. There are leaders IRL and conmen, etc. who can convince people to do just about anything (for good or bad).

So... which subclass would you like to explore?

Just a few ideas for the Combat Analyst:

• And insight check that then grants advantage on Persuasion or Intimidation against a targets.
• A feint maneuver
• a maneuver that forces movement based on psyching the target out and making them move where you want.
• Superiority die to Insight and Investigation

 

[DND_Reborn]

Just a few ideas for the Combat Analyst:

• And insight check that then grants advantage on Persuasion or Intimidation against a targets.
• A feint maneuver
• a maneuver that forces movement based on psyching the target out and making them move where you want.
• Superiority die to Insight and Investigation

It's late, so I'll give this some thought and get back to you tomorrow when I have time. We'll see what we can come up with.

EDIT: ok, real quick before i go to bed...

Master Tactician
Beginning at 18th, your ability to command others and influence the tide of battle is unmatched. As an action, choose up to six (?) creatures you can see within 60 feet of you. The creatures must be able to hear you, but do not need to see you. Until the start of your next turn, attacks made against the creatures you choose have disadvantage and the creatures you choose gain advantage on attack rolls and saving throws. If they are surprised, they are no longer surprised and can act normally. Once you use this feature, you cannot use it again until you finish a short or long rest.

 

[Horwath]

I like the variant.

I would streamline the maneuvers a little.

Number of maneuvers known and number of dice equal to proficiency bonus, and die size tied to same level when bonus increases.
+2 - d4, +3 - d6, +4 - d8, +5 - d10, +6 - d12.

battlemaster could just doubled the number of dice and maneuvers.

also, I would limit Action surge to 1/turn and keep the double (extra) Attack action.

 

[Fanaelialae]

It's a nice upgrade to the fighter class. I'd rather it focused on adding more non-combat options, since that's where I see the greatest disparity, but that wasn't your stated focus for the design, so nicely done.

I like the idea regarding spending two uses of Indomitable for an automatic success.

Just a thought, but what if Indomitable could also be used to change a critical hit into a non-critical hit? That would make it more useful in fights where you don't need to make any saves (not an uncommon occurrence IMO), and help fighters to normalize their damage. Even with a high AC, the DM rolling a (un)lucky series of crits can be devastating to a front-liner.

 

[Neonchameleon]

Exploration and Social Pillars. This build does not include any special features for these pillars. I did this for two reasons: a) fighters can contribute to these pillars already via background, race, and skill choices, as well as using one or both of their bonus ASIs at 6th and 14th level to take feats to enhance the pillars further, and b) excelling at these pillars is not for forte of fighters, but of other classes such as rogues, bards, etc.

This is where I have an extreme disagreement with your approach. As you have left things the fighter is neither more nor less than a glorified commoner unless they are fighting. A wizard gets precisely as many background, race, and skill choices as a fighter - and then gets magic on top of that with cantrips being at will.

The idea that burning feats is an acceptable solution is, and always has been, a joke. 90% of games finish by level 10 and fighters only get three ASIs by that point. It takes two ASIs to get your primary stat up to 20, and your pick of one of the combat feats is very hard to pass up.

However. The fix isn't hard. All you need to do here is two things:

• More skills known for the fighter. Instead of choosing two known they choose four. Which makes them not as knowledgeable as the rogue (who get four plus thieves' tools) but still at the upper end of skilled characters.
• One more maneuver known. This allows the fighter to start with two maneuvers rather than one. This has two effects.
  • It means that even at second level fighters who choose to specialise in combat have options.
  • It means that fighters who wish to play in non-combat pillars can take something like Precision Strike, Menacing Attack, or Riposte for melee and Commanding Presence, Ambush, or Tactical Assessment for one or more of the other pillars

I'd also advocate some sort of dash-as-bonus-action for fighters.

 

[DND_Reborn]

Number of maneuvers known and number of dice equal to proficiency bonus, and die size tied to same level when bonus increases.
+2 - d4, +3 - d6, +4 - d8, +5 - d10, +6 - d12.

battlemaster could just doubled the number of dice and maneuvers.

Glad you like it! I am sure it will be updated a bit, but hopefully it is fairly complete at this point.

Originally I didn't have maneuver dice, just a flat bonus which was equal to the proficiency bonus (so +2 to +6), but as you noted that mirrored the increasing die type, so I was going to go with that... but then finally decided to use a die just less than Battle Master dice, otherwise a strange thing happens at 17th level... Fighters would use a d12, but Battle Masters don't get d12 until 18th level!

Also, I thought 6 maneuvers was too much, frankly, as I don't want to make the Battle Master more or less obsolete.

But all that being said, these were just my design choices. If you wanted to adapt it and make the changes you suggest, I doubt it would hurt at all if it fits your game better. As we play with it more and see how things work in game, some of the changes you suggest might be adopted. We'll see and thanks for your input!

also, I would limit Action surge to 1/turn and keep the double (extra) Attack action.

Again, you could certainly do that if you wanted. Part of my goal was to allow the Fighter to do more if they want, not just more attacks.

By changing extra attack and allowing more action surges, a Fighter could Dash, Extra Attack (3), Attack (+1), Dodge, and Dash again by using all four actin surges. At 20th level, that is a ton of stuff, but you are using all your action surges so personally I am ok with it.

It also allows for a lot of movement. You could Dash (30+30), AS 1 Dash (+30), AS 2 Dash (+30), AS 3 Dash (+30), AS 4 Dash (+30) for a total of 180 feet! Not quite IRL WR speed, but pretty fast. Add Mobility feat, and it is 240 feet, which is much faster than IRL WR (which is about 210 feet per round).

If I limit AS to 1/ turn, such speeds and other physical acts aren't possible--I'd have to rewrite it to make them work.

It's a nice upgrade to the fighter class. I'd rather it focused on adding more non-combat options, since that's where I see the greatest disparity, but that wasn't your stated focus for the design, so nicely done.

Thanks, I think it will work fairly well.

I know a lot of people want more non-combat options, but do you not think race, background, and the two bonus feats could make up for it? Or do you think such other options could be better fitted to subclasses that emphasize those other pillars?

I like the idea regarding spending two uses of Indomitable for an automatic success.

Well, currently it isn't an auto-success, but a 20, which if the DC is high enough might not succeed since a natural 20 doesn't always succeed in 5E (although many groups play it that way...).

So, do you think making it a 20 is sufficient (should be in most cases) or do you really want it an auto-success? After I went to bed I was thinking about it and thought perhaps three uses of Indomitable could be auto-success, regardless of DC. What do you think?

Just a thought, but what if Indomitable could also be used to change a critical hit into a non-critical hit? That would make it more useful in fights where you don't need to make any saves (not an uncommon occurrence IMO), and help fighters to normalize their damage. Even with a high AC, the DM rolling a (un)lucky series of crits can be devastating to a front-liner.

Oh, that is a great idea! Maybe using your reaction and a use of Indomitable changes a critical hit into a normal hit. I'll add that to the OP and discuss it with my group. Thanks for the idea!

 

[DND_Reborn]

This is where I have an extreme disagreement with your approach. As you have left things the fighter is neither more nor less than a glorified commoner unless they are fighting. A wizard gets precisely as many background, race, and skill choices as a fighter - and then gets magic on top of that with cantrips being at will.

(bold added)

That is totally fair and I understand your reproach about it. This is just a difference of views on the class. It is not just Fighters, but Barbarians as well who have less to offer the other pillars, other than perhaps Fast Movement. Monks and Rogues both have features which can help, mostly in exploration, and of course Paladins and Rangers have spells (as well as the Ranger having excellent exploration features).

Anyway, yes, wizards gets the same choices to emphasize other pillars as Fighters (as everyone, really), and can choose spells to help with exploration or social challenges, but then those choices limit combat options.

The larger issue is the loss of niches. WotC designed 5E so everyone can contribute to combat via direct damage, casters via cantrips as well as some spells. So, for our game we capped cantrips at 2 dice of damage and added a recharge mechanic.

The idea that burning feats is an acceptable solution is, and always has been, a joke. 90% of games finish by level 10 and fighters only get three ASIs by that point. It takes two ASIs to get your primary stat up to 20, and your pick of one of the combat feats is very hard to pass up.

True, but again this is a matter of perspective. IME it is never necessary to get your main score up to 20. In fact, if you are only playing up to level 10, a 16 for your main ability is more than sufficient IMO. From your post obviously this is very different for you and your experiences I imagine?

As such, I can definitely understand not wanting to use feats or replace the bonus feats Fighters get with features to allow them to improve the exploration and social pillars. What are your thoughts about regulating the exploration and social pillars to a couple subclasses, as others have suggested?

However. The fix isn't hard. All you need to do here is two things:

• More skills known for the fighter. Instead of choosing two known they choose four. Which makes them not as knowledgeable as the rogue (who get four plus thieves' tools) but still at the upper end of skilled characters.
• One more maneuver known. This allows the fighter to start with two maneuvers rather than one. This has two effects.
  • It means that even at second level fighters who choose to specialise in combat have options.
  • It means that fighters who wish to play in non-combat pillars can take something like Precision Strike, Menacing Attack, or Riposte for melee and Commanding Presence, Ambush, or Tactical Assessment for one or more of the other pillars

We gave fighters 1 more skill already, so I don't see any issue with that. I think also giving fighters an artisan's tool proficiency (to represent a background occupation?) or for use in vehicles, etc. would help some.

Others have suggested more maneuvers and I would not be adverse to that, either, but currently we are play-testing one to start with. If we find that too limiting, I am sure we'll give fighters more.

I'd also advocate some sort of dash-as-bonus-action for fighters.

That is supposed to be one of the uses for Action Surge. It would also step on the toes of Rogues a bit by competing with their Cunning Action dashing. Also, why should Fighters be able to Dash as a bonus action when Barbarians and Rangers, who I see generally depicted as more "fast moving" can't?

Allowing Action Surge to fill that role means Fighters can do it, just not every round.

Now, an option I've explored but never seemed to gain much support (understandably) is spending a HD to do things like gaining an Dash during your turn.

Anyway, I know we won't see eye-to-eye on everything, and I don't think making the changes you suggest would hurt if you want them, but they don't fit into the model I am making at present. But please let me know what you think of the questions I've asked of you and we'll continue to discuss other aspects if you wish.

 

[Fanaelialae]

I know a lot of people want more non-combat options, but do you not think race, background, and the two bonus feats could make up for it? Or do you think such other options could be better fitted to subclasses that emphasize those other pillars?


Well, currently it isn't an auto-success, but a 20, which if the DC is high enough might not succeed since a natural 20 doesn't always succeed in 5E (although many groups play it that way...).

So, do you think making it a 20 is sufficient (should be in most cases) or do you really want it an auto-success? After I went to bed I was thinking about it and thought perhaps three uses of Indomitable could be auto-success, regardless of DC. What do you think?

No, I don't agree that backgrounds et al provide sufficient utility for anything beyond a very combat oriented play style. Every class gets backgrounds et al. If that were sufficient, why do so many other classes gain heaps of utility on top of that, in addition to being effective in combat?

I think that a having it be a 20 (but not an auto success) is a fairly minor distinction. In the majority of cases, due to bounded accuracy, there will be no difference between an auto success and a 20. It doesn't really matter to me which one is used.

 

[Laurefindel]

So, more of (almost) the same things rather than new add-ons. I like that approach.

Although as it was said before, I'd be happier with an indomitable = legendary resistance feature. Perhaps make the 3rd indomitable/long rest feature a 20th capstone? In other words, a 20th level fighter becomes a (full-fledged) legendary creature. Hum, now I'm thinking about a castilian fighter subclass with "lair actions" features...

 

[Mort]

So, more of (almost) the same things rather than new add-ons. I like that approach.

Although as it was said before, I'd be happier with an indomitable = legendary resistance feature. Perhaps make the 3rd indomitable/long rest feature a 20th capstone? In other words, a 20th level fighter becomes a (full-fledged) legendary creature. Hum, now I'm thinking about a castilian fighter subclass with "lair actions" features...

While I think capstones are neat and all - they're mostly flavor text because so few campaigns reach anywhere near that level.

I much prefer fun abilities MUCH earlier so players can actually experience the fun of using them and want to continue.