Kerrick
First Post
Well in the above example none of the PCs could effectively crit any of the creatures with any of the weapons - so their would actually be no book-keeping to remember at all.
Okay, so I chose undead... and incorporeal creatures... and oozes. I wanted representatives of several different types. Two problems that I can see: the vast majority of incorporeal beings (unless they're PCs using spells) are undead (non-crittable); all liquid monsters are either oozes or elementals (both non-crittable). So this begs the question: If you can't crit them, then why are they listed on your table? As far as I can tell, you have no feat that enables someone to deliver crits to these creatures.
The Devastating Critical feat has its own balance issues that hopefully I can sort out in part four of the article on absolutes.
No argument from me there - I think it's absurdly broken.
Philosophically the fire immune immortal could stand at the centre of the sun and be unaffected, even though it could still be burnt by the Phaethons fiery touch. But this approach still alienates all non-divine beings (notably epic characters), though perhaps you could argue that it should...albeit such an argument would be an appeal to authority.
I'm afraid I'm not following here...
Well changing it to feats would be simpler, however it does put us in a situation where fighters continually need more and more feats to be effective. Need to make sure fighters are still viable at epic levels.
It's one feat. I agree that fighters need something extra at epic; I'd recommend making it a fighter-only feat. This makes fighters more useful at higher levels - the party meets up with a big golem, and the party tank is the only one who can crit it, e.g.
The Metamartial Feats should take care of that, not to mention some of the other stff I have cooked up.
You leave that stuff on the burner too long, it's going to be overcooked.