Anti-gamer article

Banshee16

First Post
Saw a rather blistering anti-gamer article today. It was focused primarily on video gamers, but the two groups are pretty interchangeable, with respect to her article.

Funny how if an article like this had been written about an ethnic or religious minority, it would be banned....

Banshee




"Get a life, gamers"

Brigitte Pellerin, The Ottawa Citizen Published: Tuesday, November 21, 2006

Sorry to sound uncool. But it's pathetic to see so many people lining up for days in a desperate attempt to spend more money and a heck of a lot more time than they should on video games. What's so bad about their lives that they need to get away from them so much? Last week I was one of the few blissfully ignorant people who didn't know that Sony's PlayStation 3 and Nintendo's Wii (pronounced "we" and not "why," I'm told) consoles were about to be released in highly insufficient numbers. Nor that this marketing decision would obviously force countless shoppers to line up outside the continent's electronics stores for up to two days just to be able to boast about their luck in spending several hundred dollars on one of this year's hottest toys. Then on Friday morning I heard on the radio that soon after 8 a.m., when the first PS3s became available, the price of the 60-GB console -- the only one the truly cool want -- had reached some $3,000 on eBay, from a retail price of $660 plus a bunch more for specialized peripherals and, you know, actual games. I checked again over the weekend and the eBay prices had fallen to about $1,200-$1,500 (and a mere $1,000 for the shabby 20-GB machine). Wow. Then Nintendo released its new Wii console on Sunday, attracting more than 1,000 people to a toy store in New York City's Times Square for a midnight sale and who knows how many more in every suburban mall from Nanaimo to Memphis. It's true that these consoles are marketed as all-in-one "entertainment hubs" that you can apparently use to watch movies and download music and TV shows and stuff. But while I'm no gaming expert, I'm pretty sure the ability to watch Blu-ray movies, whatever those are, is not what compelled so many people to spend two nights camping on a Future Shop parking
lot.

Writing in Friday's National Post about this "kidult" phenomenon, Kevin Libin noted that those most likely to devote so much energy and resources getting the newest game console are "lawyers, engineers, and businessmen," not alienated teenagers. "Once upon a time," Kevin explained, "'adult toys' meant those marital aids that, if you happened to own (one), you certainly didn't publicize to your colleagues and friends. Today, the term is as likely to mean the growing number of inherently un-adult products targeted directly at those of us with receding hairlines that we happily share with our friends." And what is, on average, the age of these gamers? "In North America, it's 29. Seventeen per cent of gamers are over the age of 50." I think it's insane. That you'd waste a bunch of time and energy playing video games as a teenager is one thing. I spent many sleepless nights playing Tetris and Super Mario Bros. on what must have been the first Nintendo system way back when (I believe it was made of rocks and twigs). But I was 18 or so, the perfect age to be idiotic and spend energy trying to get away from your everyday life into a virtual world where you can, by contrast, control your destiny and -- if you're any good -- impose your rules on others. Once you reach your late 20s and 30s, it's a bit trickier. For one thing, it should then be possible to control your destiny, at least more than when you didn't have money or a driver's licence or the right to vote. And for another, if you're still having difficulty setting your own pace in life or getting others to consider your points of view 10 years after your first legal drink, you ought at least to have matured enough to realize that the solution isn't to play Genji: Days of the Blade until you grow a third thumb but, as P.G. Wodehouse might have said had he lived long enough to witness such high-tech silliness, to straighten the spine and stiffen the sinews. Granted, there are days when real, adult life stinks. And yeah, it's good sometimes to enjoy a relaxing evening doing nothing productive. But this is not what we're talking about. When so many people are willing to spend hundreds of dollars and dozens of hours waiting outside the nearest Best Buy for the privilege of owning the latest high-tech gaming console, it says something about the modern world that isn't flattering. It says life in the real world, even as an educated, well-paid professional, is meaningless to us and we'd rather get lost in a totally unrealistic high-definition virtual universe. Uncool isn't the word. Pathetic is."
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Galeros said:
That guy needs to get a life. :p

That girl :) But yeah....I suspect she started writing, based on the incidents of people getting beaten or killed over Playstation 3's, which *is* ridiculous...but it seems like an inherent bias against gaming etc. crept in, and she just took it way, way too far.

Banshee
 


Banshee16 said:
It was focused primarily on video gamers, but the two groups are pretty interchangeable, with respect to her article.

Ummm...if that's the whole article, there's not a single mention of non-video gamers in it (though, based on the author's opinion of video gamers, she'd probably think RPGers are wasting their lives, too...but there's nothing in the article that says so).
 

Smart gal, that Brigitte. After reading, hearing, and watching the violent pandemonious incidents on the mainland relating to the release of PS3 -- as opposed to the civilized Japanese release -- well, I can't say I shed a tear.

I love it when Humaniti proves me right. :]

--not a console fan.
 

Growing a third thumb would be super cool!






...as for long lines at the mall:
huge_manatee.jpg
 

I'm a gamer. I play all forms of games. I like video games but not enough to pay those prices or to stand in line for days. I think it is crazy to do so, that part I agree with.


Something to keep in mind is this is an opinion piece and not a news article. She has the right to express her opinion. Maybe if you take offense to her story you should provide a counter point.
 

Aeson said:
Something to keep in mind is this is an opinion piece and not a news article. She has the right to express her opinion. Maybe if you take offense to her story you should provide a counter point.

Having an agenda is quite different than having a point.

You can't argue with an agenda, as the wielder of it is 100% convinced of their righteous correctness.
 

IcyCool said:
Having an agenda is quite different than having a point.

You can't argue with an agenda, as the wielder of it is 100% convinced of their righteous correctness.
I'm not sure she has an agenda.
 

Remove ads

Top