Patryn of Elvenshae
First Post
mvincent said:For bears, I would treat him exactly as a black werebear... mainly because WotC put out a fairly common miniature for this (and I ended up with a lot).
Damn fine reason to do so!

mvincent said:For bears, I would treat him exactly as a black werebear... mainly because WotC put out a fairly common miniature for this (and I ended up with a lot).
Isn't the mini a celestial black bear? Two templates for the price of one.mvincent said:For bears, I would treat him exactly as a black werebear... mainly because WotC put out a fairly common miniature for this (and I ended up with a lot).
For other cases, I might try to find a suitable replacement (i.e. giants would likely become dire-were-animals) if I wanted such a thing in the campaign, or just have it not take... using con loss (and potential death) instead.
amethal said:Isn't the mini a celestial black bear? Two templates for the price of one.
werk said:Right, compare the size difference to the animal.
You guys think this rule is in there just to prevent characters from jumping 2 sizes?
Seems an odd rule, just trying to see the logic.
KaeYoss said:Some giant of a man turning into a squirrel just doesn't seem right to me.
Nope. They actually made a medium sized dwarven Were-blackbear (complete with an axe). Ticked me off because I had been longing for a real, axe-wielding (large) were-bear, and I got this useless, medium piece of plastic instead. And it was fairly common, so most collecters got several. Not sure what else you could use them for if ya can't use 'em when your halfling gets bitten by a werebear. I think WotC just didn't want the expense of making them large.amethal said:Isn't the mini a celestial black bear?
mvincent said:Nope. They actually made a medium sized dwarven Were-blackbear (complete with an axe). Ticked me off because I had been longing for a real, axe-wielding (large) were-bear, and I got this useless, medium piece of plastic instead. And it was fairly common, so most collecters got several. Not sure what else you could use them for if ya can't use 'em when your halfling gets bitten by a werebear. I think WotC just didn't want the expense of making them large.
Well, most regular (large) were-bears carry an axe too. The figure isn't a bad sculpt, it was just a poor choice for a fairly common figure. In games, such a thing (I never even heard of one before that) is certainly more rare than a regular were-bear (which will probably be rare when it does finally come out), and kinda vexing to players that desperately needed a regular were-bear at the time.KaeYoss said:Personally, though the figure isn't bad as is, it could be better. IMO the sculpt doesn't support it being a dwarf at all (except the weapon maybe).
Hypersmurf said:Do the maths on a Dire Werebat some time. The Dex is insane!
-Hyp.