Theo R Cwithin
I cast "Baconstorm!"
You might be right. But that's also completely irrelevant.So, yeah, that's something that still bugs me. People talk about how insulting the posts were, how the Dev's were trash talking all over the place, but, when you start to actually drill down and take an honest look, suddenly, most of the material is pretty banal and moderate.
Like I said, which is more likely? That people who had a hate on for the edition change started claiming that they were victims of big bad WOTC, or that WOTC really was out to piddle on the community that they'd spent about ten years building?
I've never studied business or marketing, but it seems to be a basic premise of marketing is that it is the marketer's responsibility not to offend the (potential) customer. It is not the (potential) customer's responsibility not to be offended by the marketing. And this especially applies in a world as small as the community of D&D players.
The mea culpa PCat posted upthread bears this out: WoTC understands they made a mistake. Honestly, I think that's very cool of them, and deserves some notice on the part of people who were miffed by the whole thing.