Artoomis
First Post
I got a little confused, so I am going to put forth a scenario with what I think happens, depending upon your assumptions.
Keeping in mind
and
Base Assumption: Target is the "designated foe."
Assumption 1: BANE adjustments immediately.
+3 Bane Bow, +2 Arrow. Result? Bow is effectively +5 vs. the "designated foe" so that's what you get.
+3 Bow, +2 Bane Arrow Result? Arrow is effectively +4 when launched; bow is lower at +3, so you get +4.
Assumption two: Bane adjustments happen AFTER you fire the arrow is already in the air:
+3 Bane Bow, +2 Arrow. Result? Arrow is effectively +3 when launched, and then Bane applies, which means +5 when hitting.
+3 Bow, +2 Bane Arrow. Result? Arrow is effectively +3 when launched, and then Bane applies, which means +5 when hitting.
Assumption one is built upon the "fact' that the arrow or bow somehow knows the opponent is the "designated foe" right from the very start.
Assumption two is built upon the arrow knowing the opponent as is strikes (it penetrates better perhaps)
I like Assumption two better; it makes more sense and keeps the rules nice and consistent.
How's that sound? About right for both assumptions?
Keeping in mind
The enhancement bonus from a ranged weapon does not stack with the enhancement bonus from ammunition. Only the higher of the two enhancement bonuses applies.
and
Against its designated foe, its effective enhancement bonus is +2 better than its normal enhancement bonus. It deals an extra 2d6 points of damage against the foe. Bows, crossbows, and slings so crafted bestow the bane quality upon their ammunition.
Base Assumption: Target is the "designated foe."
Assumption 1: BANE adjustments immediately.
+3 Bane Bow, +2 Arrow. Result? Bow is effectively +5 vs. the "designated foe" so that's what you get.
+3 Bow, +2 Bane Arrow Result? Arrow is effectively +4 when launched; bow is lower at +3, so you get +4.
Assumption two: Bane adjustments happen AFTER you fire the arrow is already in the air:
+3 Bane Bow, +2 Arrow. Result? Arrow is effectively +3 when launched, and then Bane applies, which means +5 when hitting.
+3 Bow, +2 Bane Arrow. Result? Arrow is effectively +3 when launched, and then Bane applies, which means +5 when hitting.
Assumption one is built upon the "fact' that the arrow or bow somehow knows the opponent is the "designated foe" right from the very start.
Assumption two is built upon the arrow knowing the opponent as is strikes (it penetrates better perhaps)
I like Assumption two better; it makes more sense and keeps the rules nice and consistent.
How's that sound? About right for both assumptions?