Stormonu
NeoGrognard
To be honest, John Connor did that to the T800 in T2.okay, that is wild but I would feel bad reprogramming a sapient robot against its will as that would be wrong.
To be honest, John Connor did that to the T800 in T2.okay, that is wild but I would feel bad reprogramming a sapient robot against its will as that would be wrong.
I’m not convinced that computer programming is a good analogy for biological brain functions.that would be none sapient as it is equivalent to instincts in animal, to be sapient is to be able to resist your natural programming.
we have yet to generate one that does not sound even more insane yet so it stands as one right now.I’m not convinced that computer programming is a good analogy for biological brain functions.
look I follow our Lord and savour on this topic, given that freedom is the right of all sapient beings I would thus see john Connor's action as immoral but understandable.To be honest, John Connor did that to the T800 in T2.
It was so long ago, I can't remember if they were intelligent or not. I think they were just mindless mooks.okay, that is wild but I would feel bad reprogramming a sapient robot against its will as that would be wrong.
if it is mindless how can it have a soul?It was so long ago, I can't remember if they were intelligent or not. I think they were just mindless mooks.
Maybe, maybe not. We don't really know how much we humans are actually going against our instinctual programming and the answer might very well be "we're not going against our programming at all, it's just that our programming is very complex."that would be none sapient as it is equivalent to instincts in animal, to be sapient is to be able to resist your natural programming.
Beats me. I only know what Dad told me, not that editor's reasoning behind it. And I'm not sure I ever saw the final episode.if it is mindless how can it have a soul?
can you resist the urge to eat when your body wants to but you do not?Maybe, maybe not. We don't really know how much we humans are actually going against our instinctual programming and the answer might very well be "we're not going against our programming at all, it's just that our programming is very complex."
As an example, I was the weird kid. "Not like other girls," in a manner of speaking. Then, in my late 30s, I got diagnosed with ASD--specifically, Asperger's. And in doing research, I discovered that the weird things I did were all very normal for Aspie girls.
A direction isn’t a cycle. Many of those have been playable in some form for multiple editions before 5e, they’re stuff people just generally want to be able to play. None of them became the monster horde race to replace another that had become a PC race. There is no cycle.The list of creatures that used to be "monsters" and are now playable PC races includes: bugbear, centaur, firbolg, gith, goblin, hobgoblin, kobold, lizardfolk, minotaur, orc, yuan-ti. Probably add in dhampir which seems to effectively be a depowered vampire spawn.
Seems like an indication of direction to me.![]()