Voadam
Legend
Akrasia said:How one could like the Buffy setting, but dislike a system that has been perfectly designed for it, is beyond me. The Buffy rpg has everything that d20 Modern has that would be useful for the setting (skills, qualities, etc.) but without all the crap that would detract from the setting (inappropriate classes, slow tactical combat, etc.).
One very important point regarding the relation between setting and system: the Buffy RPG does an excellent job of accommodating PCs with vastly different 'power levels' (e.g. the Slayer verus mere 'white hats' like Xander). This feature -- essential for the setting -- is wholly absent from d20 Modern, with its insistence on crunch and 'balance'.
I guess one could use d20 Modern for Buffy -- but to do so would mean using a system that fails to capture what is great about the Buffyverse (again, IMO and IME).
An analogy: using standard D&D rules for Middle-Earth. What a disaster.
So you are saying if you want a game with player dynamics like the show (a main combat competent protagonist with supporting help) go for the Eden book.
Whereas d20 Modern will feel like D&D in the buffyverse where each player is roughly comparable in combat and there is not that protagonist support split among the players or the stories.