C&Ds for Online D&D 5E Character Generators

Ed Friedlander reports that WotC has asked him to remove his D&D character generators. Ed ran the generators at his site, Pathguy.com, including a D&D 5E character generator. His Pathfinder RPG character generator is still running. Thanks to Slayyne for the scoop (who also reports that at least one other site has also closed). [Update: while the actual request has not been shared, others have reported that these are very amicable requests].

Ed Friedlander reports that WotC has asked him to remove his D&D character generators. Ed ran the generators at his site, Pathguy.com, including a D&D 5E character generator. His Pathfinder RPG character generator is still running. Thanks to Slayyne for the scoop (who also reports that at least one other site has also closed). [Update: while the actual request has not been shared, others have reported that these are very amicable requests].

You can see his closing note here.

"After almost two decades, Wizards of the Coast has asked me to remove my online character generators. I appreciate the many people who have written and thanked me for my work, and I hope you will continue to enjoy the hobby.

As a physician and gamer, I've supported and defended the hobby, and helped concerned families understand its value.

The "Dungeons and Dragons" phenomenon has encouraged young people to study other cultures. It is a game in which people work together to accomplish a meaningful goal. Characters even define themselves in terms of their good morals and their ethics. On one level, it simulates the spiritual warfare described in the Christian scriptures and in the Arthurian legends on which the game is based. I am proud that I was able to make a contribution.

My generator for Pathfinder will of course remain online. Click here for more information about this role-playing game.

May your dice come up 20s.

Ed Friedlander MD
"

Back in November, the D&D Tools website suffered a similar fate, as have a couple of spellcard websites. While WotC appears to be largely easygoing as far as fan creations are concerned, they do take action when content from their products is copied or distributed.

Ed's character generator created characters by selecting a number of options, and output a character sheet similar to below. I'm not all that familiar with it, so I don't know what text, if any, it may have borrowed from the official rules.

As yet, there's no license (Open Gaming or otherwise) for D&D 5th Edition (although WotC does intend to do so), although a number of publishers have published books anyway using the older Open Gaming License for D&D 3E and 3.5.

What is interesting to hear is that some people who have received such requests describe them as very amicable. Toxic Rat says "Speaking from personal experience, I received a very nice email asking that I take down particular content owned by WotC. No threats, no warnings of legal action, just a request to honor their copyright." That's great to hear.

dwarfey.jpg

 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad


DaveDash

Explorer
Seems pretty silly and behind the times. Since they have limited resources they should be encouraging their community of fans to build content, tools, etc.

This isn't really growing D&D, is it?
 

Morrus

Well, that was fun
Staff member
I've always maintained that the sight of a vibrant fan community creating stuff for your game is something that many game designers and companies would give an arm and a leg for. This is what you want: it's people embracing and playing the game with public and open enthusiasm. It's a wonder to behold, and something to be hung on to.

As a whole I think WotC does a good job at that. There are hundreds of blogs and sites producing homebrew material for 5E. Sure, the quality varies, but that's not the point. There's a dynamic, creative fan community surrounding this game unlike that seen since the early days of 3.x. I think WotC should be applauded for not interfering with that.

Then, occasionally, out of those hundreds and hundreds of things, they'll ask someone to stop doing doing something. It's happened about a half dozen times.

The question, then, is what is it about those half dozen things that prompted this? What makes them different? What behaviour exactly is it that WotC doesn't want? Automation? Trademark usage? Content distribution? My guess is the latter.

I wish these folks would share the C&Ds so we all didn't have to guess.
 

DaveDash

Explorer
The only thing that makes sense to me is they're on the verge of releasing something online themselves, and want to drive traffic to their site and not someone else's.

Could even be a lite basic character builder or whatever.

I still think it's the wrong approach. The more people building D&D stuff the better for their brand. If they want to build their own stuff make it better than everyone else.
 

Paraxis

Explorer
A lawyer type person could weight in much better than I on this, but isn't there something along the lines of how they have to be able to show they defended their IP with these C&D's for when they do go to court on someone, because if they ever do need to fight someone in court and that person's lawyers can point to dozens of examples of them not protecting their IP when they knew about infringements then that is a valid defense for the guy they do end up suing.
 

Morrus

Well, that was fun
Staff member
A lawyer type person could weight in much better than I on this, but isn't there something along the lines of how they have to be able to show they defended their IP with these C&D's for when they do go to court on someone, because if they ever do need to fight someone in court and that person's lawyers can point to dozens of examples of them not protecting their IP when they knew about infringements then that is a valid defense for the guy they do end up suing.

There's an element of that with trademarks. Not with general copyright infringement though. They have to protect the name "Dungeons & Dragons" (see Xerox, Hoover, Photoshop). They don't have to protect the description of magic missile (not that there might not be other compelling reasons to do so, but it's only trademarks you're in danger of losing if you don't protect them).

Contractual issues might be one thing. If they've given someone an exclusive license to do something, problems might arise if it transpires that it's not quite as exclusive as was promised. Even more so if someone paid thousands for a license to do something that you're quite happily letting everybody else do for free.

Of course, that only applies if someone is infringing on your IP, not just because they're doing something you don't want them to do. That's why I'm curious about the actual C&D and what type of violation it addresses.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DaveDash

Explorer
There's an element of that with trademarks. Not with general copyright infringement though. They have to protect the name "Dungeons & Dragons" (see Xerox, Hoover, Photoshop). They don't have to protect the description of magic missile (not that there might not be other compelling reasons to do so, but it's only trademarks you're in danger of losing if you don't protect them).

Contractual issues might be one thing. If they've given someone an exclusive license to do something, problems might arise if it transpires that it's not quite as exclusive as was promised. Even more so if someone paid thousands for a license to do something that you're quite happily letting everybody else do for free.

Hmmm these are good points that I did not consider.
 

delericho

Legend
If the sample character in the OP is an accurate representation of what the tool provides, then something is amiss - as we know game mechanics can't be protected by copyright (only the specific expression of them), and there's nothing else there. That suggests to me that the tool must have provided more - probably write-ups for the various selected powers/backgrounds/race selections/etc. In which case, WotC are indeed right to take action.

Weird thing is, there are auto calculating character sheets right here on this site, and those appear to be fine (and very helpful).

See above. As long as the auto-calc sheet only does the numbers for you, but requires you to enter the text (for power descriptions, etc) yourself, there shouldn't be an issue.

This may be a good sign that Wizards may be developing its own generator

I'll believe that when I see it. And by "when I see it", I mean the working product, not an announcement, beta, or other interim step.
 

wedgeski

Adventurer
Contractual issues might be one thing. If they've given someone an exclusive license to do something, problems might arise if it transpires that it's not quite as exclusive as was promised. Even more so if someone paid thousands for a license to do something that you're quite happily letting everybody else do for free.
That shouts out as being the case here.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top