Y youspoonybard First Post May 5, 2004 #12 I think, right? So long as you don't have stacked people... A spell is targeted (targetted?) at an intersection, and it's a 5 foot radius, so that's 4 corner squares, right? EDIT - DUH. 4 <> 5. Last edited: May 5, 2004
I think, right? So long as you don't have stacked people... A spell is targeted (targetted?) at an intersection, and it's a 5 foot radius, so that's 4 corner squares, right? EDIT - DUH. 4 <> 5.
MerakSpielman First Post May 5, 2004 #13 I never envisioned the 3.0 version as a combat spell. More something that the local Druids would do during a storm to wreak their vengeance on a local town or something.
I never envisioned the 3.0 version as a combat spell. More something that the local Druids would do during a storm to wreak their vengeance on a local town or something.
Hypersmurf Moderatarrrrh... May 5, 2004 #14 youspoonybard said: A spell is targeted (targetted?) at an intersection, and it's a 5 foot radius, so that's 4 corner squares, right? Click to expand... Call Lightning seems to be an exception - it states "Any creature in the target square...", so it seems it isn't aimed at an intersection. -Hyp.
youspoonybard said: A spell is targeted (targetted?) at an intersection, and it's a 5 foot radius, so that's 4 corner squares, right? Click to expand... Call Lightning seems to be an exception - it states "Any creature in the target square...", so it seems it isn't aimed at an intersection. -Hyp.
Y youspoonybard First Post May 5, 2004 #15 Good call, guess I screwed up on that one. Teaches me to be excited when people explain targetting rules... : )
Good call, guess I screwed up on that one. Teaches me to be excited when people explain targetting rules... : )