Belen
Legend
philreed said:And Treasures of Freeport.
Plus I know that there's more Freeport stuff coming. From here it looks pretty well supported.
Again, I do not count PDFs as support.
philreed said:And Treasures of Freeport.
Plus I know that there's more Freeport stuff coming. From here it looks pretty well supported.
Oops, yeah meant 3.0 - will go back and fix that typo...Maggan said:Just checking, did you mean to write "3.0" or was the channels choked with 2nd ed stuff? That makes sense, to me, but 2e material still i circulation doesn't and then I would like to know more, so I'm just asking to get the point clarified.
BelenUmeria said:Again, I do not count PDFs as support.
BelenUmeria said:Again, I do not count PDFs as support.
Pramas said:If 2002 was the height of the glut, I believe we are approaching the nadir. The Green Ronin d20 strategy in 2004-2005 was to hang tough, keep putting out the quality books we are known for, watch a lot of our competition fade away, and then reap the benefits. Well, here we are, still supporting d20 with new lines like Thieves' World (and product #2 of that line is an adventure no less) and even doing a new d20 Modern setting (Damnation Decade), but we have yet to see the Great d20 Rebound.
2006 will be an interesting year.
Mouseferatu said:Hey, Belen? Please don't take this the wrong way, but...
That sounds like your problem more than that of the companies in question.
If you want to put forth the complaint "Companies don't offer the kind of support I like," that would be valid. But claiming there's no support, and then saying, "Oh, I don't count that as support" sort of undermines your position.
The simple truth is, companies who offer PDF support for a line are, well, offering support for the line. It may be true that it's not the best way to support the line. It may be true that they're not reaching all the customers they could. It may be true that a lot of people don't like using PDFs. (Heck, I write PDFs between larger contracts, and I'm still not a huge customer of the PDF market.) All of those are arguable.
But just dismissing them as, essentially, not existing is no more accurate than to say "WotC never published modules," and then when someone points out that they did, saying "Oh, they had blue covers, so they don't count."
Okay, maybe it's not quite that absurd...But it's on the same continuum.
Hussar said:I'm curious, why not? If someone is savvy enough to find the d20 publishers and buy from them, surely they are savvy enough to type in the link that's posted in most of the books and find the pdf's. Granted, I'm not one to buy pdf's typically, I want the book in my greedy little hands, but, I would think that a mess of pdf's for something certainly do count as support.
BelenUmeria said:Not at all. By and large, Freeport has ceased to exist in the last few years. Black Sails was never followed up. PDFs only benefit die hard fans who stuck with the city and I am willing to bet that few did. PDFs support like 5,000 people...maybe. For most people, they have moved on to other things and other places.
Hussar said:I'm curious, why not?
delericho said:I'm inclined to think that the sluggishness of the d20 market has more to
do with the volume of currently-available material than the lack of companies doing adventures.
I have shelves bowing under the weight of d20 books. I have a half-dozen boxes containing yet more roleplaying books, and I have at least one pile of books tucked away in a storage closet out of the way. I will never again make use of a large proportion of these books. Quite simply, I do not need to ever again buy a d20 book, without ever having to fear that I'll run out of material to use.
As a consequence of this, I have become rather more picky in what I buy. In fact, I essentially no longer even look at a book that isn't from Green Ronin, Malhavoc or, of course, Wizards. There are two exceptions: I'm interested in the Babylon 5 line from Mongoose (but haven't actually bought anything in months), and will look at the occasional product I see recommended here. I'm aware that this means I'm missing some real gems, but I don't have a lot of time to seek out good products, nor any huge incentive to do so, and I don't have a FLGS where I can browse such things at leisure (sadly, following a house move)
The one area where I am interested in new product are 'disposable' items like adventure modules. However, even here, an adventure would have to have some sort of hook to interest me, as I subscribe to Dungeon, and so again have more material than I will ever use.
I don't know how typical I am of the consumers in the d20 market. However, given the size of the market, if even a small number of people are in the same position, that could have a significant effect on the whole, especially with so many small companies competing for the same small pool of customers.
(As regards Charles Ryan's comments, I'll say only this: I am very interested to hear more about this 'long term solution' that Wizards are working on.)