.[/QUOTE]
The definition you bolded above was... 2. To violate rules deliberately, as in a game
I am fine with that definition of cheating.
that doesn't however say a thing about either the benefit of one or the detriment of others.
thats the subject in part of the debate and the disagreement here.
some believe cheating in and of itself is a detriment to others. some don't.
some believe it isn't cheating unless it is done for benefit. some don't.
i beliebe cheating is what you posted, a violation of rules done deliberately.
I also believ that can be done for harm or for good of others and that one is definitely wrong while the other isn't.
i have cheated many times and almost always for the benefit of others. Whether it be undervaluing my shields in SFb so the guy fighting me "did some damage" and did not feel completely skunked, or throwing a kill opportunity so the most dramatically appropriate PC gets the kill... its produced good results and I would laugh if someone decided to kick me out over it.
we differ a lot on this subject, which is fine.
Jim Hague said:I've already addressed the topic of social lubricant. See my reply upthread for a nice definition of cheating - the cheating being discussed is most assuredly not social lubricant; it's violating the rules to the benefit of someone and the deteriment of others. Go back and re-read what I posted, please - I said it's the best (most ideal) policy, but not necessarily the most expedient.
.
The definition you bolded above was... 2. To violate rules deliberately, as in a game
I am fine with that definition of cheating.
that doesn't however say a thing about either the benefit of one or the detriment of others.
thats the subject in part of the debate and the disagreement here.
some believe cheating in and of itself is a detriment to others. some don't.
some believe it isn't cheating unless it is done for benefit. some don't.
i beliebe cheating is what you posted, a violation of rules done deliberately.
I also believ that can be done for harm or for good of others and that one is definitely wrong while the other isn't.
i have cheated many times and almost always for the benefit of others. Whether it be undervaluing my shields in SFb so the guy fighting me "did some damage" and did not feel completely skunked, or throwing a kill opportunity so the most dramatically appropriate PC gets the kill... its produced good results and I would laugh if someone decided to kick me out over it.
I advocate different options which don't begin from a hit the door perspective.Jim Hague said:What extremes? I advocate removing a potential problem before it becomes an actual social issue, instead of allowing a cheat to end up angering everyone else at the table, including myself.
.
we differ a lot on this subject, which is fine.