I am a practicing Catholic, gamer, scientist, and teacher. According to Jack Chick, I may well *be* the antiChrist. (Don't tell my mom, though.)
There are so many little things wrong with this piece, that it would be a waste to list (though some bits, like "Perhaps Hitler and rape are no longer praised." stand out as especially offensive) but as far as the question of the original poster goes, note that most, if not all, of us are on a completely different page than the writer.
Note part of Mercule's post:
Mercule said:
5) He says, "They make this mistake because they equate Roman Catholicism and its robed clerics for Christians," which is downright insulting. For someone who likes waving his Bible around and making reference to it (not that there's anything wrong with that), he might want to have an understanding of which group stapled together the first copy.
I should note that I've got some pretty big disagreements with Catholicism, but to call them non-Christian without any rationale (do I see a pattern?), is a pretty big stretch for this guy to make.
or, from the article
William Schnoebelen said:
The arguments I get from those defending D&D (Christians or otherwise) are similar to those from people defending their favorite cult (Mormons, Masons, etc.).
In short, what they call "christian" is not what most of the rest of us would call Christian. There is an idea of a tiny trickle of "true christians" among the rest of us hell-bound types
6) He discusses the absence of Christ as a power in the default D&D game. Personally, I see this as a strength of the game. As DM, I have to determine the motivations and actions of the "powers that be". If that power happens to be Christ, it becomes a catch 22 -- I can't imagine NPCing Jesus as a holy and respectful thing.
If you're a Christian, it is a simple thing to say "for some reason, unfathomable to me or anyone else, this particular universe was set up a bit differently and God does not make His presence known directly. He exists and is superior to anything you'll be interacting with, though." I should know. That's been the statement in my game for two decades.
This is also the approach taken by the very religious Tolkien with regards to Middle Earth, but JRRT would not have counted as a Christian to Schnoebelen. I certainly don't mind being in this boat myself.
I would consider it to be tremendously problematic to play in Christian world as I can get five-six people to agree on a common moral basis, gamewise (for short periods of time, at any rate) while trying DM Christian morality when each player has a different idea of what that means in practice would be a nightmare, not to mention legitimate concerns about trivializing religion. The times when it looks like it might work are in cases like Green Ronin's
Testament or
Midieval Player's Handbook when the interpretaion is explicitly established as just part of the game.
A search on the ENWorld message board turns up a number of interesting threads in which Jack Chick came up, some of which weren't even closed by the moderator!
