Whizbang Dustyboots
Gnometown Hero
It makes a lot more sense than having just one or two gun emplacements on a huge ship.Ranger REG said:"Battleship-style" phaser turrets?!?!!!
It makes a lot more sense than having just one or two gun emplacements on a huge ship.Ranger REG said:"Battleship-style" phaser turrets?!?!!!
OOPS...Wolf72 said:ARCS even!!!
Gun Turrets arent gun turrets if they arent obviously noticeable. These are actually small compared to most turret style spaceship designs.Ranger REG said:Sorry, but they look too big. I'm glad this is a joke.
The pointy bit was part of the original Enterprise in the first season.D.Shaffer said:In any case, I thought it was a pretty decent design, except for the pointy bit in front of the nacelles.
Ranger REG said:Not that I have changed my mind on this design. "Battleship-style" turrets?!?!!!
It is so not right.Mouseferatu said:Out of curiosity, why is that a problem for you?
Ranger REG said:It is so not right.
Well, I prefer the phaser weapon placements to be more outward, as in the perimeter of the saucer section. Way too many BIG turrets too close to the middle of the saucer. One or two banks is enough to cover the dorsal side of the saucer.Mouseferatu said:Based on what?
The fact that the original ship didn't have them? This (had it been real) was intended for a reboot.
The turret is one of the most effective designs for a ship-mounted weapon. The Enterprise has weapons. Other than purely personal taste--which is certainly valid, but I'd like to hear you say that's where your objection comes from--I don't see anything "not right" about it.