Ranger REG
Explorer
I dunno. Are their ships using "battleship-style" phaser turrets?Whisperfoot said:I'd like to get other people's opinions.
I dunno. Are their ships using "battleship-style" phaser turrets?Whisperfoot said:I'd like to get other people's opinions.
Ranger REG said:I dunno. Are their ships using "battleship-style" phaser turrets?![]()
Now THAT's Star Trek.Whisperfoot said:No, but in their early episodes, the ships do barrel rolls.
Whizbang Dustyboots said:It makes a lot more sense than having just one or two gun emplacements on a huge ship.
They were until aircraft began to dominate, at which point battleships started to bristle with guns albeit of much smaller caliber then their main battery.Meloncov said:Not necesarily. Navel battleships have been steadily moving towards a smaller number of larger guns.
Brown Jenkin said:Reimagining is not what Trek needs. What it needs are executive producers that can recognize a good script when they see one. There are still plenty of stories that can be told without reimaginging things.
Villano said:True. What I don't understand is why they are going backwards. First, Enterprise and now this. Why not take the Next Gen route? If they can't do any stories set in the same time frame as Next Gen/Voyager/DS9, why not jump ahead 100 years? If they want to tell deifferent stories, why not start with a real blank canvas instead of painting over everything that came before?
Mustrum_Ridcully said:Maybe it's time we lose our focus on having only one original version of a universe or show - It worked in other areas (comics reboot, plays are played with different actors or different locations, songs are interpreted by different musicians...) Maybe one reason why it is so hard is because we invest so much more in a series/universe then we do in a single book, play or song...

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.