Much better. I hope WOTC take a look at this thread.JVisgaitis said:There were a lot of postings about this after the Gencon release. I hope they redo it. Why we can't get a party of adventurers in a "Dungeon" fighting a "Dragon" I'll never know. Here's the redux cover I did some time ago. While I'm not WAR's biggest fan, this is pretty close to perfect for me.
![]()
Well, Angus McBride has been dead for a year or two now, so it might take more than the lure of cash to bring him back to do artwork.danbuter1 said:They're an improvement over the 3e covers. But I really wish WotC would hire someone other than Reynolds to do art. I really think Angus McBride, John Howe, or Alan Lee would do a much better job. And if any rpg company can afford them, it's WotC.
vade retro me satanas.danbuter1 said:I really think Angus McBride, John Howe, or Alan Lee
While love WAR's art, I have to say, Kormarck would be a better choice for the cover. WAR's art is dynamic and powerful - and doesn't suffer from being interior art. And his covers are often associated with Eberron. I like his association with Eberron, give him all Eberron covers... and fill the books with WAR. But for a PHB cover, I like Kormarck's atmospheric art.Hjorimir said:WAR is generally pretty darn good. Though if it were up to me, I would have gone with Michael Komarck.
Hobo said:Well, Angus McBride has been dead for a year or two now, so it might take more than the lure of cash to bring him back to do artwork.
And... I guess you're saying that you think D&D should be a Lord of the Rings clone?
Hey, that green dragon pic---that's not on WAR's website. Where'd you find that? I need a copy for my digital fantasy art collection. Badly.
EDIT: Whoops! My bad. He died this last May, so only 4-5 months ago.
This.Hjorimir said:...if it were up to me, I would have gone with Michael Komarck.
It's called "branding". If you are putting out THE main book of D&D, it HAS to look like THE main book of D&D. In a perfect world, it has to show a dragon and a dungeon. It has to grab the eye. It has to prove the sentence "a picture is worth a thousand words" right.Wormwood said:I guess the reason I *don;t* like the green dragon cover is because it looks just like D&D.
There's nothing new or different about it. Just a bunch of guys in a room with a dragon. We've seen this image before.
*shrug*
I like the new cover because it effectively conveys a vision of D&D that is unexpected while still grounded in the swords & wizards genre.
It'd also be a cool Otus tribute, bringing to mind the cover of the Moldvay/Cook Basic set (stairs coming down, fighter vs. green dragon, etc) -- especially if the dragon on the other book is scrying the scene.Klaus said:The green dragon mock-up JVisgaitis put together does that.