J.Quondam
CR 1/8
This.In particular because we have no way of knowing if any of his claims are remotely true at all. I'm not calling Rogen a liar, necessarily, but his whole schtick isn't exactly done out of the goodness of his heart, is it? It's all about the likes/clicks/follows/etc (AKA the $).
Anything said by a commentator / pundit / op-ed journalists / etc is immediately suspect, since their livelihood is entirely based on saying what their audience wants to hear. If they didn't do that, after all, they wouldn't be successful opinionators.
ETA: Of course, good such journalists cite reliable sources, and amplify information from real experts rather than snake-oil salesmen. It's the quality of those sources that make the difference between good, truthful punditry and the cynical, dishonest crap.
Last edited: