D&D and the rising pandemic


log in or register to remove this ad

billd91

Not your screen monkey (he/him)
Hopefully, if convened, the grand jury will do the right thing and refuse to indict. Otherwise, this does smack of being racially motivated...
 

Zardnaar

Legend
Insofar as trends are not guarantees, that's true. And certainly, given that we are annoyed when pizza takes too long to show up, it won't happen "quickly" on our terms. But quickly, maybe even lightning speed, in evolutionary terms.

One can look at previous pandemics. They seem to hang around for around 3 years.

They generally seem to mutate into less deadly variants.
 

Umbran

Mod Squad
Staff member
Supporter
One can look at previous pandemics. They seem to hang around for around 3 years.

The number of useful historical examples, though, is small, making the trend a bit difficult to be sure of. And (we can hope) this time around is different, as other pandemics did not have such successful vaccine development programs.

News this morning is that Pfizer and Moderna have both increased and stepped up their delivery schedules - it is expected they'll deliver enough vaccine for 300 million Americans by May
 

Garthanos

Arcadian Knight
The number of useful historical examples, though, is small, making the trend a bit difficult to be sure of. And (we can hope) this time around is different, as other pandemics did not have such successful vaccine development programs.

News this morning is that Pfizer and Moderna have both increased and stepped up their delivery schedules - it is expected they'll deliver enough vaccine for 300 million Americans by May
around 2 months sooner than previously
 



Umbran

Mod Squad
Staff member
Supporter
The more successful tend to be less deadly... they can still have horrible linger effects

Nobody is saying that the thing is going to become negligible. Merely that chances are over time it will get better for humans, rather than worse.
 

Thomas Shey

Legend
The more successful tend to be less deadly... they can still have horrible linger effects

To an extent; counterselection is usually for early mortality, but you can absolutely get something like AIDS which is successful and still lethal, it just takes a while (barring modern drug treatments). But that still, in practice, tends select out a fair number of really bad infections over time; its just not a certainty that, as you say, it'll avoid long-term effects.

Or, a long-winded way of saying what Umbran says above.
 

Dannyalcatraz

Schmoderator
Staff member
Supporter
The number of useful historical examples, though, is small, making the trend a bit difficult to be sure of. And (we can hope) this time around is different, as other pandemics did not have such successful vaccine development programs.

News this morning is that Pfizer and Moderna have both increased and stepped up their delivery schedules - it is expected they'll deliver enough vaccine for 300 million Americans by May
There’s also a few notable counterexamples, like smallpox and bubonic plague. Neither evolved into less deadly forms. One, we used vaccination to eradicate in the wild, and the other we changed our behavior in order to minimize its impact on us (PLUS developed treatments to survive it).

See also anthrax, SARS, MERS, ebola, Marburg, Lhasa, and Hantavirus.
 

Remove ads

Top