Rystil Arden
First Post
I'm convinced that a Fey book would sell better. If ENWorld is any indication, we had a poll a while back with huge support for a Fey book. I think a lot of people know that Fey are cool and know that we can do a lot more with them but some of them are really looking for help on that, and you just don't get that help from the current D&D monster books.Shawn_Kehoe said:... I'm wondering if everyone posting here is really following the guidelines of the exercise.
I mean ... the scenario is that you are Brand Manager ... it's your job. If your selections result in abysmal sales, you lose that job.
Some of the answers seem to be along the lines of "8 books I'd really like to read" rather than "8 books I think will be good and profitable."
As I said in my entry above, I'd really like a Fey Book over a Giant Book. But I'd approve the Giant Book first, because it would sell better IMO.
Also, keep in mind that the books are supposed to be released in a one-year timeline. If all 8 books follow a single theme, be it monsters, planes, or campaign settings, the very best fan reaction you can hope for is "too much, too soon" or "too much of a good thing."
I guess what I'm really saying is: roleplay as what your character the Brand Manager would do, not what you as a consumer would want.![]()
Personally, I've come up with fey-related plots and adventures on my own, but I'm always happy to see more stuff, and to those others, a Fey book is more useful than a Giant book because it is very easy to run a giant-based adventure vis-a-vis running the Fey in an evocative way. Giants are the quintessential combat brutes, after all, whereas Fey are limned in mystery, illusion, and enchantment.
Anyway, we could have a bet. Scott can help us by getting WotC to publish both of the books. Then we see which one sells more

