Daggerheart General Thread [+]

[Vael]

Yeah, Eberron as a setting can support a lot of campaign options, it's one of the things I find so compelling about it. To the point where campaign frames are a good way to focus and limit the scope of an actual Eberron campaign.

Unfortunately, Keith does not own Eberron, so any official Daggerheart support for Eberron would have to be done with WotC's permission. So I don't see one coming anytime soon.

 

[Reynard]

There is a bit of that in this video. Baker talks about how potentially multiple campaign frames would be required for playing Eberron with Daggerheart depending on the focus you want for your campaign.

I expect this to be the tact going forward with full campaign settings: any given campaign setting will have multiple campaign frames using that setting. For example, the Eberron one would (theoretically) have frames built around Sharn Inquisitives, Mournland scavengers, and Xendric explorers.

 

[Kichwas]

Who’s “they” here? Darrington? Sure, that would get side eye. But free fan content is obviously okay. Todd, of course he could. Keith, of course he could. Keith’s blog and podcast have done conversions for other systems before.

Yeah.

Sword of Shannara exists after all. It’s often described as Lord of the Rings with the serial numbers filed off and the logo slightly changed.
- It’s that Roelexx watch you bought at the flea market for $19.99.

Brooks actually wrote it as a post apocalypse SciFi story and what we got was after Del Rey got his hands on it as editor and sent it back for rewrites until it was basically 1 inch past the line of plagiarism…

(Makes you feel for whatever nightmare they forced Brooks through to get that result.)

But the point being that if they want to make Aberon - a setting about Clanks… they can. We’ll know… but it will still sell.