Daggerheart General Thread [+]

[Reynard]

Is it though? I feel like it's inextricable from determining which approach is the right approach for a specific solo.

To clarify, I was talking about the math, not the question of "what is more fun." Dynamic enemies with shifting abilities is always going to be more fun.

 

[aramis erak]

I got it to the sunday virtual group...
Wow!

Ran the QS/QP module, with it's pregens, but full corebook rules use.
A 15 minute aside on why the trees look like people... (They grow to mirror who was buried beneath)... and magic (Yeah, there's baseline magic everywhere...)

I'm not a high pace GM, but this ran quick. Even if we weren't using the VTT.

 

[overgeeked]

I mean, I thought it was a good bit of actionable input from somebody who’s done enough running and playtesting to give some direct suggestions. Their comment history has some designs & other crafting hiding in it.

He’s one of the designers of Daggerheart, specifically the Adversaries section, so I’m sure his posts are generally good and helpful. But I’m not looking for “ask yourself what purpose does the monster serve in the story” kind of answers. I’m looking for the underlying math behind monster creation. I’m looking for Blog of Holding MM on a Business Card style breakdown and usefulness.

Apparently there was more math or something during the playtest or provided to the community at some point that didn’t make it into the final book.

There’s talk of a free all digital homebrew guide coming. And that same poster just dropped something over on Reddit. Here’s to hoping it’s more math breakdowns.