Darth_Asparagus
First Post
Hi all,
when I look at some of the feats/powers in 4e (like Dark Fury), I get the impression that a damage +1 or to hit +1 is something like a coveted treasure. I can kinda understand the conservative stance on to hit but taking a feat to get +1 to damage?
I can't put my finger on it but I vaguely recall several instances where a miniscule damage bonus was given (Shadowfell gloves?)
Since some of the solo monsters now have hitpoints in the 100's, would anybody even be remotely interested in 1 damage more or less?
when I look at some of the feats/powers in 4e (like Dark Fury), I get the impression that a damage +1 or to hit +1 is something like a coveted treasure. I can kinda understand the conservative stance on to hit but taking a feat to get +1 to damage?
I can't put my finger on it but I vaguely recall several instances where a miniscule damage bonus was given (Shadowfell gloves?)
Since some of the solo monsters now have hitpoints in the 100's, would anybody even be remotely interested in 1 damage more or less?