Noctem
Explorer
Which was why we, as a group despised 4th. And one of the reasons we will discard FILO for 5th.
FILO?
Which was why we, as a group despised 4th. And one of the reasons we will discard FILO for 5th.
FILO?
First in, last out would be my guess.
Correctamundo. In this thread's case, the disintegrate would take it's full effect before any other effect. If the Druid is transformed (meaning his only existing form at the moment) into a Dove, with 3 hit points, and he is hit with a disintegrate spell, and he take 22 points of damage and blows his save, then ALL effects of the disitegrate spell would occur, before he transformed back into Druid form. Poof. Dust. Dust would in no way be able to transform into any version of a Druid.
I would let the barbarian's ability save him, since that's what it is designed to do. Basically it just gives him a saving throw to not be dusted. I'm never going to look across my gaming table and tell a player that the class ability that could save their character from being permanently destroyed won't work because of an interpretation of an ambiguous rule. When it comes to destroying a player character, all rule interpretations go in favor of the character. If I kill your character permanently, you'll know that it is in spite of getting as many breaks as reasonably possible. It might still happen, but I'm not gonna dust you on a technicality.
Correctamundo. In this thread's case, the disintegrate would take it's full effect before any other effect. If the Druid is transformed (meaning his only existing form at the moment) into a Dove, with 3 hit points, and he is hit with a disintegrate spell, and he take 22 points of damage and blows his save, then ALL effects of the disitegrate spell would occur, before he transformed back into Druid form. Poof. Dust. Dust would in no way be able to transform into any version of a Druid.