Shemeska
Adventurer
Umm, of course he's going to defend the edition he worked on. Not just professional pride, but business sense and him wanting to keep his job sorta dictates that he keep talking about it positively regardless of anything else.
Even if you totally botched something -or multiple things IMO-, you don't admit to it, and right until the end you defend it. So of course Wyatt would describe any hypothetical 5e as very much like 4e. I can't blame the guy for being intelligent about gamer perceptions of edition success (support drops if people perceive support to be dropping, or anything bad about it being admitted to by the people working on it).
If the current 4e design team remains in place, 5e will look like 4e. If 4e goes down in flames and a new design team handles things, it will look vastly different from 4e potentially (a return to 2e style flavor, please please please). Of course arguably any situation where 4e goes down in flames would likely preclude WotC actually making a 5e D&D themselves.
Even if you totally botched something -or multiple things IMO-, you don't admit to it, and right until the end you defend it. So of course Wyatt would describe any hypothetical 5e as very much like 4e. I can't blame the guy for being intelligent about gamer perceptions of edition success (support drops if people perceive support to be dropping, or anything bad about it being admitted to by the people working on it).
If the current 4e design team remains in place, 5e will look like 4e. If 4e goes down in flames and a new design team handles things, it will look vastly different from 4e potentially (a return to 2e style flavor, please please please). Of course arguably any situation where 4e goes down in flames would likely preclude WotC actually making a 5e D&D themselves.