What module is composed entirely of mundane tasks?
DM's no longer getting crits on PC's
- Thread starter dumdragon
- Start date
I don't think so. You just need systems that create stakes and provide interesting choices no matter the task. For example, if D&D had a stress track, non combat tasks could be made just as consequential as combat.
Gorck
Prince of Dorkness
You're referring to exactly 1 module. That's it. One adventure that illustrated that D&D could be about more than just killing monsters and collecting treasure if that's how you want to play. Since Strixhaven was released, WOTC has released several adventures (Call of the Netherdeep, Light of Xaryxis, the entirety of Radiant Citadel, to name a few) that have gone back to the "traditional" adventures.
Bill Zebub
“It’s probably Matt Mercer’s fault.”
Oh god yes. Sorry if this is no longer what the cool kids do, but I still love clearing out a dungeon without needing to figure out the DMs complicated backstory in order to do it.
It might be a stretch to say that "collecting treasure" is a thing 5e is about. Sure you can do it but everything that normally grew from doing that was removed or made "optional" in ways that cause problems with growing fruit from that treasure.
D&D hasn't been "about" collecting treasure for about 40 years, ever since the Hickman Revolution. It has been about solving problems.. But it has always been about solving problems with violence, so there's that.It might be a stretch to say that "collecting treasure" is a thing 5e is about. Sure you can do it but everything that normally grew from doing that was removed or made "optional" in ways that cause problems with growing fruit from that treasure.
Lanefan
Victoria Rules
Not necessarily, provided you and the players can immerse yourselves into what might be intense and dramatic roleplaying through a tense situation. For example, the PCs are negotiating with the local Baron for release of some (in the PCs' eyes) unjustly-arrested locals. Violence is not an option unless the PCs are intent on committing suicide-by-guard.
Here you have a non-combat situation with high stakes. No narrative rules required. Just play it out.
The drawback here is, of course, that such situations are much harder to bring about than are combats.
Lanefan
Victoria Rules
Any module where there's something bigger going on in town and the PCs/players completely miss it (or worse, actively ignore it) even when repeatedly clubbed upside the head with hints and clues.
Been there, DMed that.
No I disagree, it's both 3.x & 4e had magic item need while 4e had gold for various rituals too. not simply the collecting treasure so much as collecting treasure to use that treasure in service of other goals such as ones that count as hickman revolution type problem solving.
Azzy
ᚳᚣᚾᛖᚹᚢᛚᚠ
Tired hyperbole is tired hyperbole.
That's what I said. I didn't say there wasn't treasure. I said acquiring treasure wasn't what D&D was about since the mid-80s.
wicked cool
Adventurer
Horrible rule. I would argue a lot I’ve seen so far is bad
Lanefan
Victoria Rules
Treasure lost much of its gamist-mechanical impact in the mid-80s with the slow demise of xp-for-gp, sure; but acquiring, collecting, and spending treasure has otherwise been much of what D&D was about - all the way until 5e where while acquiring treasure is still fun there's far less in the game (as written) to spend it on.
Bill Zebub
“It’s probably Matt Mercer’s fault.”
That....baffles me.
Let's examine the traditional reason adventurers go on adventures- to face dangerous challenges and collect fat loot.
Dungeons were presented as multi-level affairs that became more deadly as you descended to the lower floors, but the increased risk granted increased reward. Actual experience points from monsters were insufficient to level you up save for very slowly, so you actually earned xp for treasures hauled up from the depths (in addition to the occasional sweet magic item to give your character more options and power).
By 3e, however, it was noted that designing monsters around unknown variables like ability scores and magic items was difficult- who could say what a character could have, and when they should have it?
So at this point, treasure was the fuel to let you acquire magical items, which became a separate "xp track" of their own- in addition to what your levels got you, you could funnel gold acquired into purchasing items. At low levels this was your plate armor and masterwork swords, but eventually this led into utility items, consumables, and eventually bonuses to attack, damage, AC, and saves.
Unfortunately, despite multiple efforts, 3e's attempt to make item creation a fundamental part of the game led to busted and overpriced items. 4e decided to continue with the process of turning treasure into power, but took a more conservative approach to magic items, and removed custom item creation from the equation.
5e decided to make magic items optional, not really assumed in enemy design, and left entirely up to the DM how to implement (but with little guidelines as to how to use them). They then made magic items a little more robust, though with a catch that you can only ever use so many of them at once.
This has had several notable impacts on game design.
1) the DM is never really sure if giving out magic items will make the game less difficult than it should be, or if not giving out said items makes it harder than it should be.
2) When attempting to design monsters, there's presumably some expectation of magic weapons at some point, but when is unknown.
3) The capacity of magic items to grant new abilities to classes that are less versatile, as was their original intent, is wholly lost, as no one has any expectation of acquiring anything desired.
4) gold is almost completely vestigial beyond level 5, yet the DMG guidelines and WotC adventures continue to hand out great amounts of the stuff. Treasure is no longer even a real incentive for adventures, which affects the verisimilitude of the game- why even take on dangerous tasks, if the reward is effectively pointless?
Magic magic items available for sale, and giving players some choice in what they acquire isn't the only solution, since some people find "magic item marts" even more reprehensible than the uselessness of gold, but there should be something here!
Instead the DM is left to "figure it out" on their own.
(And yes, there are suggested gold piece costs for magic items in the DMG, but they are ludicrous, based on rarity, making a magic potion cost the same as adamantine armor or a cloak of displacement- in fact, using those costs, adamantine full plate is cheaper than actual full plate, lol).
Dungeons were presented as multi-level affairs that became more deadly as you descended to the lower floors, but the increased risk granted increased reward. Actual experience points from monsters were insufficient to level you up save for very slowly, so you actually earned xp for treasures hauled up from the depths (in addition to the occasional sweet magic item to give your character more options and power).
By 3e, however, it was noted that designing monsters around unknown variables like ability scores and magic items was difficult- who could say what a character could have, and when they should have it?
So at this point, treasure was the fuel to let you acquire magical items, which became a separate "xp track" of their own- in addition to what your levels got you, you could funnel gold acquired into purchasing items. At low levels this was your plate armor and masterwork swords, but eventually this led into utility items, consumables, and eventually bonuses to attack, damage, AC, and saves.
Unfortunately, despite multiple efforts, 3e's attempt to make item creation a fundamental part of the game led to busted and overpriced items. 4e decided to continue with the process of turning treasure into power, but took a more conservative approach to magic items, and removed custom item creation from the equation.
5e decided to make magic items optional, not really assumed in enemy design, and left entirely up to the DM how to implement (but with little guidelines as to how to use them). They then made magic items a little more robust, though with a catch that you can only ever use so many of them at once.
This has had several notable impacts on game design.
1) the DM is never really sure if giving out magic items will make the game less difficult than it should be, or if not giving out said items makes it harder than it should be.
2) When attempting to design monsters, there's presumably some expectation of magic weapons at some point, but when is unknown.
3) The capacity of magic items to grant new abilities to classes that are less versatile, as was their original intent, is wholly lost, as no one has any expectation of acquiring anything desired.
4) gold is almost completely vestigial beyond level 5, yet the DMG guidelines and WotC adventures continue to hand out great amounts of the stuff. Treasure is no longer even a real incentive for adventures, which affects the verisimilitude of the game- why even take on dangerous tasks, if the reward is effectively pointless?
Magic magic items available for sale, and giving players some choice in what they acquire isn't the only solution, since some people find "magic item marts" even more reprehensible than the uselessness of gold, but there should be something here!
Instead the DM is left to "figure it out" on their own.
(And yes, there are suggested gold piece costs for magic items in the DMG, but they are ludicrous, based on rarity, making a magic potion cost the same as adamantine armor or a cloak of displacement- in fact, using those costs, adamantine full plate is cheaper than actual full plate, lol).
Nefermandias
Hero
Minor correction, 4e did NOT remove custom magic item creation and in fact, made it more versatile by adding residuum and disenchantment.
You were allowed to create items, but there was no "I'm going to create a wholly unique item" as there were no guidelines for pricing such things.
I'd add that they did not even do that bold bit with how randomly attune is applied. A player can have +3 platemail +3 shield & multiple +3 weapons without using a single attune slot while a pen* & a loaded/magical die* will use up two of your three attune slots. If anything by dumping body slots 5e makes it easier to use more magic items since they no longer conflict for a slot(or bonus type). Luckily that still leaves that hypothetical PC a free slot to bring their ac from 26 to 27 if they can just find a ring of protection.
* Those two aren't chosen for any reason specifically, they were just the first & most obvious "why the heck is this attune" magic items I was able to find
Oh believe me, I hate attunement with the fury of a thousand exploding stars. It's not only as arbitrary as the old "body slots" mechanic, it's also nonsensical at times as well.
Like, ok, we accepted that you can only have 2 magic rings for...reasons. While being allowed to have a small galaxy of Ioun Stones orbiting your head. But now the only thing stopping me from wearing 2 capes is common sense and the DM, lol!
I can ride a Broom of Flying for unlimited flight, no attunement required, but Winged Boots require attunement, only let me fly for 4 hours at a time (and slower!), and (presumably) can't be worn with other magical footware! Yes, that totally makes sense.
And why do we even have attunement slots, when getting magic items at all is completely up to the DM, let alone worrying about having so many of them that you need some kind of limiting factor on their use?
Similar Threads
