FormerlyHemlock
Hero
Come again? Using what parameters? What are you basing these claims on?
Sounds like the start of a new thread...
Come again? Using what parameters? What are you basing these claims on?
Weird. You are the second person today, in this very same thread, to get called on their bombastic claims, only to try and get cute to avoid answering.Sounds like the start of a new thread...
Weird. You are the second person today, in this very same thread, to get called on their bombastic claims, only to try and get cute to avoid answering.
Are you saying that your post was off topic and inappropriate for this thread? I certainly said no such thing. I thought they were interesting enough claims, albeit extreme, that I took the time to ask you for more information on how you came to those conclusions.Start a new thread. I guarantee you an answer there.
Did I say I disagreed? What I said was, "Come again? Using what parameters? What are you basing these claims on?" Yes, all of it. What are you basing all of those statements on?One reason I didn't answer your question here is that I wasn't even 100% sure which part of the statement you quoted you disagreed with.
No. I'm asking what you are basing that claim on. What makes you think that?Are you asking why Fighters make the best archers and greatsword-wielders?
No. I'm asking what you are basing that claim on. What makes you think that?Are you asking why they don't make the best tanks and shield bashers?
I don't know. I certainly didn't ask you if you would. Do you feel that strongly about these opinions?Are you asking which of those opinions I'm willing to defend to the death?
I thought I was pretty clear. "Using what parameters? What are you basing these claims on?" Were those questions vague to you?I don't want to spend lots of time writing a post when I don't even really know what you're asking,
You brought them up. If they are so off topic, why did you do it? (Also, not a vague question.)especially discussing tanks and shield bashing is totally off topic for this thread.
How about you start a thread stating these conclusions and how you came by them. If your OP is written with clarity in mind maybe I'll respond to thank you for explaining yourself and your theories.If you start a new thread I'll at least know for sure what you're asking, assuming that your OP is written with clarity in mind.
I wonder how many people who voted are actually GM's, and not just players who like the skill...
That's unfortunate. I was really hoping your statements were based on something substantive, rather than just baseless hyperbole. Just like how you claim I asked you twelve questions. It wasn't. That last post of mine had only eight direct questions (seven if you don't count the same exact question twice in a row). Do you find you are prone to exaggeration in general? Or just here?
I wonder how many people who voted are actually GM's, and not just players who like the skill...