Hold up. I think we might have different ideas of what reskinning means. In my book, a fireball that does cold damage isn’t a reskin, because fireball does fire damage. That’s either a rules change or a new spell that is very similar to fireball. You can’t reskin a rapier as a versatile weapon because it isn’t. You could reskin a versatile weapon as a rapier, but I can’t imagine why you would want to, since rapiers already exist without reskinning and also versatile would be a weird property to want on a rapier anyway.
Like... As I understand it, reskinning is just taking one set of mechanics and naming/describing it a different way than it was written. I guess changing the damage type of a spell is a gray area since most of the time damage type just amounts to description, but since it can make a difference for damage resistances and vulnerabilities, I would argue it’s just over the line of what I would call reskinning.
