Do you ignoe my topics on purpose?

[Ferret]

Practicly all of my new threads(Ferrets art chalange, Torben, and Hows this) all have views but no replys, Is this on purpose?

 

[Cedric]

As circumstances would have it, don't think I've noticed one of your topics until now...but I took this chance to look up another one of your topics and reply to it.

Cedric

 

[RangerWickett]

You're disliked because you're an interloper, with you 700+ posts. You're not part of the hive-mind like the rest of me . . . um, I mean, us! Rargh! *eats the wall and reveals a hexagonal lattice filled with honey*

Whee!

You should start a thread about WotC's next book after the BoVD, the BoSTD, which will cover what happens to the PCs after the DM starts using the material from the BoVD.

 

[Fast Learner]

I never even look at who started the thread. I just go by they subject.

I'm much less likely to look a threads called "How's this" since I have no reason to believe it will apply to me and I'm not going to look at every thread that has a subject that doesn't explain itself.

Maybe try more descriptive subjects. You'll get even more views (probably), increasing the odds of responses.

Alternately:

1. You may not be bringing up anything people are interested in,

2. You may not be saying anything that people feel a need to respond to because you pretty much said it all, or

3. People may be purposefully ignoring you.

 

[Dinkeldog]

Remember, we all agreed to ignore Ferret.

 

[Bagpuss]

and you are?

 

[Buttercup]

I never even look at who started the thread. I just go by they subject.

What he said.

 

[Ferret]

Well, More descriptive things then!And my name in the subject:

"Ferrets post please look!"

 

[Grazzt]

I never even look at who started the thread. I just go by they subject.

That's how I do it.

 

[madriel]

I know the feeling. Most threads I've started have sunk like a stone.